User talk:Coolagrawal1999

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Denise Welch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Denise Welch was changed by Coolagrawal1999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-04-10T19:33:20+00:00.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nancy Carter with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tamwar Masood with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Libby Fox. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Libby Fox was changed by Coolagrawal1999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880639 on 2016-04-11T15:06:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Nick Cotton, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Anemone Projectors  17:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

EastEnders Sharon and Phil
Hi. If you watched Friday's episode properly you'd have heard Sharon say that their divorce is nearly finalised - Phil needs to contact his solicitor before the decree absolute can be arranged. So they are still married - please stop changing it. Thanks. anemone projectors  19:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Finding Dory with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Finding Dory, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of past EastEnders characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Partridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Manav
Hi Manav,

It's Fraser here! How are you?

bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by FAH28 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lacey Turner. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:TRAILER
Hi there, re: this edit, though I know you meant well, and your contribution is appreciated, mundane marketing techniques like trailer releases, poster releases, an actor appearing on a talk show, are not inherently noteworthy. Please see WP:TRAILER for more info. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi again, please stop adding content about mundane marketing techniques like trailer releases as you did here. See my note above. WP:TRAILER represents existing community consensus. If you wish to edit against consensus, you will first need to achieve local consensus in each article you edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Please read WP:LINKSTOAVOID  5 albert square (talk) 23:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Max Branning
Hi, can you please stop changing the reference I inserted to confirm Max's Christmas Day return to the BBC's cast list. As I already explained several times in my edit summaries (which you ought to be checking if you don't understand why your edits are being reverted), the cast list does not confirm that it is Max's return episode, but there are several news sources that do confirm it. Thanks. anemone projectors  12:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Date ranges
Hi, regarding this edit you made and other similar ones, please don't. I spent a long time changing these, and explained them in my edit summaries. Wikipedia's MOS was changed recently at MOS:DATERANGE, and now clearly states: "Note: A change from a preference for two digits, to a preference for four digits, on the right side of year–year ranges was implemented in July 2016 per this RFC." However, it doesn't apply in tables or infoboxes with limited space, so please don't change those to match. Thanks. anemone projectors  23:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

EastEnders character creators
Hi, can you please stop adding the names of creators to the infoboxes of characters without supplying a reliable source? It is not necessarily the executive producer of the time that creates the character, so please do not assume. If you have proof that someone has created a character, you must cite your source. Thanks. anemone projectors  15:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Starring parameter of film infobox
Hi there, re: this, "Starring" is not the same thing as "appearing in". A starring credit is a special credit that an actor usually negotiates for. Thus, we shouldn't be inventing starring credits. If you add to this field or change the values, you should provide a justification that is consistent with the infobox guidelines found at Template:Infobox film, where we typically include the names found on the poster's billing block. Since many Indian film posters do not include starring roles in the billing block, an alternative would be to use the film's on-screen credits. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Arbitrary reordering of cast
Please don't reorder cast as you did here without providing a clear explanation in an edit summary. This tends to look like you are entertaining your personal preferences (ex: "I like this actor better, so I'll move him up." or "I think this actress has more seniority in the industry") rather than adhering to community guidelines like the instructinos at Template:Infobox film, which is what we should be doing. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by EastEnders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bye. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Running totals
Re: this, are we setting a precedent that all films featuring actors who have collaborated before should contain a running total of all the films they've starred in together? When we get to a dozen films, will that be too much, or enough, or...? Bing Crosby and Bob Hope appeared in about 7 "Road to ___" films, but I don't see any attention drawn to this at Road to Singapore. There's nothing at MOS:FILM that would suggest this is of any academic use. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maestro2016 (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Nick Cotton. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Melcous (talk) 00:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Thugs of Hindostan
Re: this, as previously noted on your talk page, we don't organise cast based on perceived "seniority" in the Indian film industry. I'm not particularly inclined to revert your edit, because I don't happen to care about the credit order, but changing it arbitrarily like this is not constructive. Nobody's going to die if Aamir Khan is listed before Amitabh Bachchan for a few months. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * As I've previously noted above and in January 2017, please stop arbitrarily reordering cast as you have again done here. Your remedy at this point is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus. If you make the change again without consensus, it will be considered disruptive. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

[About it]. Please provide me link where I can find that YRF denied this statement. Harsh Rathod  10:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC) [About this]. You have been warned two times for it. So now take this level 3 warning.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Now let's talk about deletion of white spaces. I delete white spaces simply because of this reason: It decreases the time taken to process the page by the servers. Suppose for instance if the time taken by the servers to process the page is 148 milliseconds then the page with deleted useless spaces is processed in just 122 milliseconds. Now if you ask what is the point in this? Then I would reply I do this just for the heck of it. And it is not at all disruptive.

Also, as explained by Bomberman. Please stop reordering cast. Wait, for the trailer or film to release and then we will make the order in accordance with credits. If you do this again, the warning level will be increased. Harsh Rathod 11:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Ownership
With regards to the edit summary on this edit, please read WP:OWN. "No one "owns" content (including articles or any page at Wikipedia). If you create or edit an article, others can make changes, and you cannot prevent them from doing so." Wikipedia is edited co-operatively. Please do not issue little "threats" in edit summaries to try to prevent other editors from altering your edits. That is not how wikipedia works. Every time you make an edit you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. This means that anyone may alter your contribution at any time. If you do not wish to agree to those terms for an edit then you should not make the edit. Thank you. -- Begoon 13:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kishore Kumar, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Outlander 07@talk 10:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Coolagrawal1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Linda Carter did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Lightbluerain ❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dilip Kumar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2019), you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow • 19:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vikram Vedha (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing. SP013 (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2022
Hello, I'm Taukeerppw. I noticed that you changed some content from Mohammad Rafi, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks- Taukeerppw (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ian Beale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hlliwmai (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barbie as the Princess and the Pauper, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajkumar (1964 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pran. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 13:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please explain what poorly sourced content I added and to which article Coolagrawal1999 (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Geeta Dutt. - Arjayay (talk) 21:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This content already existed on Geeta Dutt's page; it was added by another writer. I only rewrote it because it was true. I did not intend to be disruptive. Coolagrawal1999 (talk) 22:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.  livelikemusic   ( TALK! ) 21:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't appreciate your threats. Please explain what disruptive editing there has been Coolagrawal1999 (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)