User talk:Coolbutlame

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Diamond Eyes (song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the confusion. I wasn't trying to post any kind of biased, since the Deftones have a drony, shoegaze type quality to their music. If i'm the only one who thinks that this is true, i'll stay out of it. Coolbutlame


 * If you are the source of the information that you're contributing to an article, then that information is considered original research. Original research is not acceptable for an encyclopedia and will generally be removed immediately. It's not considered original research, however, if you are able to find a reliable and published authoritative source that supports your ideas. For a suggested list of potentially good sources for this subject, see WP:ALBUMS/Sources. For a tongue-in-cheek essay on why the Wikipedia community frowns upon mass alterations to the genre-field of infoboxes, see WP:GENREWARRIOR. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultra saturday


A tag has been placed on Ultra saturday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)