User talk:Coolcat747

Henry David Thoreau
Thank you for your contributions to Henry David Thoreau. Some edits have been made to the article in order to bring it into harmony with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines shown there. All edits that do not follow these guidelines have been changed to match what our MoS recommends. Wikipedia does not require writers to follow all or any of these rules, but their efforts will be more appreciated when they do so. --Dylan Lak e 20:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * If you think there should be an addition to the Thoreau article, you should start a discussion on the talk page. As it stands, I don't see why a style manual that includes quotes from Thoreau warrants inclusion. Thanks. --Dylan Lak e 01:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Your contributions
We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --Dylan Lak e 02:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The Classics of Style
The article The Classics of Style has been or may be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This is under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pan Dan 02:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The American Academic Press


The article The American Academic Press has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability unclear

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fgnievinski (talk) 02:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)