User talk:Cooldude7273

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Michaelas10   (Talk)   18:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Thank You
Thanks for your kind note. The page is something I've worked hard on, and I'm glad to hear you think it is a job well done. :) AUburnTiger 07:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Roswell High pics and historical refs
Cooldude, if you'd be willing to check with the yearbook/Sting staff to see if they have any nice looking pics of the school that could be uploaded into Wikipedia Commons that would be great - the nicer the pic the better and I figure those groups would have some good lookin' pics readily available - AUburntiger is also going to take some pics in the near future so the more choices the better. Pics of the school/stadium and other campus feature would be really helpful in achieving that goal (check out the Georgia Tech article as thats the type of pics that would be nice). If you are not familiar with Commons I can provide some assistance in uploading and tagging with appropriate copyright tags.

Also, if the library has some good reference books that could be used to cite the history and campus sections (reliable sources)) that would also be helpful. I'd guess the school library probably would have some sources that wouldn't be found elsewhere. If you're not famliar with the citations set-up, we give you some pointers on adding. If you are not intested that's fine as well, but since you have easy access I thought I'd ask. Thanks. --Roswell native 02:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've emailed The Sting and Yearbook advisers as I'm not personally familiar with them. I'll let you know when I get a response! Cooldude7273 09:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Norton07.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Norton07.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Rankings
They post them late sunday night and I just stay up late enough to get them :P

AUburnTiger 03:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Not yet, we should move up as three top ten teams lost this weekend, so I was going to wait until they come out. But I'll just change the ranking once they come out. AUburnTiger 19:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Maybe. I'll think about it. North Cobb is beatable though if we play up to our potential. AUburnTiger 02:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Norton08.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Norton08.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Spyware Doctor
Thank you for your input on Spyware Doctor.I have recently installed it on my laptop. Reading the talk page about it and seeing all the negative comments made me doubt my choice in purchasing it. Then I saw your comment.Everything that you said made sense and made the other comments discrediting SD seem really silly by comparison.I created an account just to praise you on that comment.well put. Thank you Ggirl21 (talk) 07:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Glad I had a positive impact on someone! Thanks for the kind feedback - it's always nice to know when wikipedia contributions are appreciated! Cooldude7273 (talk) 10:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
Hey it's Danny from TTA :)

Control-alt-delete (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SpywareDoctor.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:SpywareDoctor.PNG I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SpywareDoctor5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SpywareDoctor5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 06:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Thetecharea logo.png


The file File:Thetecharea logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)