User talk:Coolhariz

Wikipedia and copyright
— Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Dianna,
 * I have posted original content for Kerala Law Academy which I got from the management. However, I found that the content has been removed due to some copyright issue.
 * I would like to inform you that the content I posted was 100% original and prepared by the management.
 * As you said " If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here " Can you please help me with what document or evidence you need to proof that we own the company?
 * Since we haven't published this content on our website.
 * Please treat this as urgent as the content presently listed about us on Wikipedia is false and not true. This is causing negative image about us.
 * Kindly help me to publish our original content
 * Regards
 * Hari Coolhariz (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If you are employed by the Kerala Law Academy, or are a third-party representative of this organization, then you are required by Wikipedia policy to disclose this information. If this is true, then you must review and comply with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure policy before making any further edits. The conflict of interest guidelines also apply to you as well.
 * An organization has no right of ownership or control over the content of a Wikipedia article about them. Wikipedia is unconcerned with what an organization wishes to say about itself. We are only interested in what reliable, independent sources that have no vested interest in the organization have chosen on their own to publish about it. Wikipedia articles are paraphrased summaries of material that has been previously published in reliable third-party sources. What effect this has on your company's reputation, positive or negative, is of absolutely no concern here.
 * You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt your work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that you are attributed as the author. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 08:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Your edit to Kerala Law Academy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)