User talk:Cooljuno411

AfD nomination of Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage
I have nominated Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lets drink  Tea  22:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion
How about taking whatever you're trying to say in that page and finding a way to work it into some existing page about an identifiable topic? The problem most people seem to have (and I agree) is that the page as you created it has no clear topic. It looks like many of the pages you've made here have been deleted. Why don't you take some time to learn more about Wikipedia, and work on existing articles, before trying to make your own from scratch? More pages does not always equal better encyclopedia. Friday (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Many of the pages i've created have been deleted??? Just because you see a few things on this page about some iMac thing i was trying to do, doesn't mena my created articles have been deleted.... --cooljuno411 [sign my contact archive] 20:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Note
The above category will be deleted per 28 February 2009 WP:UCFD.
 * Category:User:Cooljuno411/life archive

One of the commenters suggested that you be informed about:
 * Special:Prefixindex/User:Cooljuno411
 * Special:Prefixindex/User_talk:Cooljuno411

I hope this helps. - jc37 02:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
I'm no administrator or moderator for Wikipedia, just a fellow volunteer, but I would just like to thank you for your valuable contributions to California's Assembly Bill 390 (the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act) article.

Though I live thousands of miles away in North Carolina, I firmly support this bill and can't wait to see its outcome.

Thanks again!

Dmarquard (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Your welcome. Hope the bill passes too. : ]--cooljuno411 [sign my contact archive] 18:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Definition of ex-gay
Hi, Cooljuno411, I notice that back in January you changed the definition of 'ex-gay.' I've left a comment about that on the article's talk page, since I wasn't sure whether your change was based upon a reliable source or not. If you could find a source that defines 'ex-gay' in the broad way you defined it, that would be very helpful. Thanks. Born Gay (talk) 01:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

re: Sexual orientation
CJ - you keep trying to promote the same issue from different angles, even though it's clear there's neither consensus nor sourcing for the ultimate goal you want to achieve (on which I'll refrain from speculating). Please stop pushing the point; it's getting old. come back with better sourcing, or come back in a few years when there's been a shift in the scholarly world. Don't keep forcing me to shoot you down on technical grounds, particularly when I'm not sure I disagree with you in the abstract (as far as I understand what you're after). I don't think you recognize the limits of wikipedia as an information medium, but I do, and I hate to keep having to push you back just because you can't keep yourself within those limits. And I will keep pushing you back, even if I decide I agree with you, because in this case you're operating outside the scope of the project.

reign yourself in, dude, and do productive work that fits on wikipedia. be bold, but don't be impudent, because that's just not going to get you anywhere (at least not with me). -- Ludwigs 2 06:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Unlabeled sexual orientation
I have nominated Unlabeled sexual orientation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Unlabeled sexual orientation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - ℅ &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 06:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Nothing personal here but the POV fork is an unacceptable issue on Wikipedia. What we have here is practically the same thing as Pomosexual, which is where you branched out this article from. Without better academia and worldly distinction between the two, this can only be seen as original research. - ℅ &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 06:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Pomosexual is a coined term to describe an unlabeled sexual orientation... There is controvecy with using the term "pomosexual" because it can be intreated as a sexual orientation. And i kinda do take it personal when you call people like me, who do not lablel with a sexual orientation, original research. I am not "pomosexual", so please do not Intail that i am.--cooljuno411 07:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * CJ, you're not original research, but the topic is. I applaud the fact that you choose not to label yourself with a sexual orientation (gender ascription causes almost as much trouble in the world as religion  ), but the scholarly world hasn't caught up with this idea.  when it does, we can include it.  please focus your efforts on getting the concept established in the real world, rather than on trying to get it established on wikipedia.  -- Ludwigs 2  14:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

American Phycological Association?
I don't think that's what you meant. Phycology is not the same thing as psychology. Lady of  Shalott  02:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing it out. : ] --cooljuno411 03:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * hey! Algae have feelings too! -- Ludwigs 2  03:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Template ref
A tag has been placed on Template:Template ref requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. - ℅ &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 19:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI
Just want to direct your attention to the WP:MEAT policy, which in a nutshell says that recruiting friends offline to support you in a discussion is as much a violation of policy as if you'd registered the other account yourself (well, almost - in any case, strongly discouraged and not likely to lead to the outcome you seek.) Best to win arguments by force of reason alone. Nathan  T (formerly Avruch) 20:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ???, ok... thanks for letting me know. --cooljuno411 20:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Santee_ca_seal.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Santee_ca_seal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 10:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:200kmhuk.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:200kmhuk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Cannabis

 * Sorry to see you decided to remove yourself from the list of WikiProject Cannabis participants, as we need members to continue improving articles related to cannabis. However, I respect your decision, and feel free to contribute in any form in the future! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of people who do not label their sexual orientation
I have nominated List of people who do not label their sexual orientation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of people who do not label their sexual orientation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Removing AfD tag
You can not simply remove the AfD tag just because you reverted a title change to the article. It doesn't work that way. The Afd must run its course, and the tag must stay on the article throughout. Lady of  Shalott  20:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Contents right
Template:Contents right has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — RL0919 (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hypocrisy
I find it fascinating that you were one of the people who originally made the AB 390 article look so poorly written, NORML could have written it with less bias, and now somehow you think you can just delete stuff you don't like with bogus reasoning.

 yes, Dr. Sanjay Gupta DID say he was against decriminalizing cannabis as a DIRECT RESULT of AB 390 being introduced  my error.-- still he mentions decrim efforts in California ... but who says he needs to say the exact words "I'm against AB 390" -- you're not helping any cause by being biased I hope you realize this.

READ the ref!!! And use the talk page next time.


 * **You may edit the quote of what he said on the page, if that's what you don't like, but you need to take it to the talk page first. To take it out completely is disingenuous and you know it. That's not how it works here.

Thank you

&lt;tommy&gt; (talk) 14:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Achivearticle
Template:Achivearticle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Archives in userspace
Hi, Josh. I wanted to ask you about the pages you have listed at User:Cooljuno411/docs/Archives/Archived Articles and Talk. Did you have any specific plans for these pages? To just have old copies of articles sitting in your userspace indefinitely seems to go against the rules stated at WP:UP. But I didn't want to just nominate them for deletion without asking you about them first. If you don't need them anymore and want to have them deleted, you can just add db-userreq to the top of each page, and an admin should be along to delete them shortly. --RL0919 (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Since I didn't hear back, I've gone forward with nominating the archived pages for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cooljuno411 archives if you want to participate there. Thanks. --RL0919 (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Per consensus at the MFD discussion page, the pages have been blanked, all material remains in the page history.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:San Diego Green Line SDSU.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:San Diego Green Line SDSU.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Optigan13 (talk) 07:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

San Diego Trolley
Cooljuno, I have a question about the "ideas for new service" that you recently added to the San Diego Trolley article. Were these your own ideas for new service, or are they based on some source? If they are based on a source, can you cite it somewhere? If they are your own ideas, they really don't belong in the article, per WP:No original research. Thanks for any clarification. --MelanieN (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN

Copyright problems with File:San Diego Trolley map, derived inspiration from MTS map.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:San Diego Trolley map, derived inspiration from MTS map.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:San Diego Trolley map, derived inspiration from MTS map.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:San Diego Trolley map, derived inspiration from MTS map.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Koman90, A+ (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Greater San Diego
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. House1090 (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Santee ca seal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Santee ca seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Urban communities of San Diego County for deletion
The article Urban communities of San Diego County is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Urban communities of San Diego County until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

maps
Hi - I noticed you were the creator of the East County, North County, and South Bay maps for San Diego. I was interested in either editing those, or creating alternative ones along similar lines. Would you be willing to share with me how you made them? I think they look awesome, and I'd love to have your input/advice. Thanks! Dohn joe (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject VVMAP
WikiProject VVMAP, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject VVMAP (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject VVMAP during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  03:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Virgin America Red.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Virgin America Red.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Immigrant cuisine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immigrant cuisine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Immigrant cuisine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Geoff Who, me?  17:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Josh-medium-hbf.png


A tag has been placed on File:Josh-medium-hbf.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 02:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cooljuno411-Josh.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cooljuno411-Josh.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 13:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

-It clearly says "self made". I think you missed that.--cooljuno411 16:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Plastic Surgery Slumber Party


The article Plastic Surgery Slumber Party has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable musical release. No evidence of charting. No evidence of awards. No evidence of long-form professional reviews.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:24, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Cooljuno411/docs/Archives/Michael Jackson listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Cooljuno411/docs/Archives/Michael Jackson. Since you had some involvement with the User:Cooljuno411/docs/Archives/Michael Jackson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 12:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox American International Metropolitan Area
Template:Infobox American International Metropolitan Area has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Nocopyright listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Nocopyright. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Nocopyright redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 09:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Same-sex guardianship
Hello, Cooljuno411,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Same-sex guardianship should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Same-sex guardianship.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Steve Quinn (talk) 01:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Santee Trolley Square.jpg


The file File:Santee Trolley Square.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, unclear use/purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Santee Trolley Square.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santee Trolley Square.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stripes teengirl hairstyle.jpg


The file File:Stripes teengirl hairstyle.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Stripes teengirl hairstyle.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stripes teengirl hairstyle.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 12:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Voorhuis painting moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Voorhuis painting. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2023 European migrant crisis
Hello, Cooljuno411,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged 2023 European migrant crisis for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Josh-medium-hbf.png


A tag has been placed on File:Josh-medium-hbf.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)