User talk:Coolkaku1

Welcome!
Hello, Coolkaku1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as AOT 40, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Caffeyw (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of AOT 40


The article AOT 40 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, as it stands OR/essay article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Caffeyw (talk) 17:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

AOT40
I just checked your reference for the page. It really does not help any matters that you're using a definition file from somewhere. WP is not for dictionary definitions. Also the referenced matter would not qualify as reliable source since it's not published by someone other then the author. All materials should be information published by parties not involved in the writing. ie is there a scientific journal that has information on this? Then that could be used to re-write the article. Caffeyw (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)