User talk:Coolug/Archive 4

Notability of Sky larkin
A tag has been placed on Sky larkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sky Larkin
A tag has been placed on Sky Larkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Skylarkinpromopicture1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Skylarkinpromopicture1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Adding Sky Larkin to a wikiproject
You should consider adding the article to an appropriate WikiProject so that you can attract more attention from editors who are experienced in the subject. Take a look at WikiProject Alternative Music. They can advise you on demonstrating the notability of the subject, and give you good feedback.


 * To add the article to the wikiproject, put the WikiProject Alternative music template on the article talk page
 * To become a member of the project yourself, put the User Wikiproject Alternative Music template on your user page

Give me a shout either here or on my talk page if I can help with anything. (I assume you've guessed who I am in reality!) Papa November (talk) 11:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Casimir cones
I have nominated Casimir cones, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Casimir cones. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Army1987 – Deeds, not words. 17:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Lemurs 2009 mandjhouse.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Lemurs 2009 mandjhouse.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Human Centipede (First Sequence)
A tag has been placed on The Human Centipede (First Sequence) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GrooveDog &bull; oh hai 12:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Pacsafe
Hi Coolug. I declined your speedy deletion nomination of this article. In my opinion, it is written in a neutral and informative way, and provides inline citations. Take the article to AfD, if you disagree. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * To my mind I thought the article seemed a little overly promotional but knew that as only an admin could actually physically delete it there would be a review by a much more experienced editor first. Thanks for messaging me with your comments. cya Coolug (talk) 09:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks pretty promotional to me. At best, there's no indication of why the company is notable.  There are no references to independent sources.  Take it to AFD if you like.  Papa November (talk) 10:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * stuck an advert tag on it, that'll do for time being, might do more later if nowt changes. Coolug (talk) 10:17, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Foreign-language articles
Hi. When you find a foreign-language article like Wirtualny pokój danych and have an idea what the language might be, you can use, e.g. . That produces a more useful template with links to the Polish Wikipedia and to Google Translate, so that you can get an idea what the article is about. In fact, this is a good way to confirm identification of the language - click "Show Preview" and then "Google Translate", and if it provides a reasonably clear English version, you have probably guessed right. I have even managed to identify Farsi (as opposed to Arabic) this way, though I am completely ignorant of the languages and their alphabet.

Also, it's a good idea to give the author a welcome template like if he hasn't had one, and there are useful templates to ask him to use English and point him to the relevant other Wikipedia, e.g.  produces:

Proszę, nie pisz artykułów po polsku na angielską Wikipedię. Artykuły po polsku są milej widziane na polskiej Wikipedii.

Please do not contribute text in Polish to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at Polish Wikipedia.

There is a list of those at WP:PNT/T. I think many users are unaware that there are WPs in other languages.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I'm a bit new at this recent changes stuff so still not aware of every procedure yet. Shall do this with any future non-english stuff I find. cya Coolug (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Voice event processing
Hello Coolug, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Voice event processing - a page you tagged - because: How is this spam? If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Ged UK  20:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that came across rather blunt! I didn't feel that that article was at all spammy. Thanks for your work though! Ged  UK  20:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * maybe spam was the wrong tag then, but as it stands the article has nothing to imply any kind of notability at all so should be improved if the article is to survive. I might try and find an appropriate tag later. Coolug (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There isn't really a speedy deletion tag that covers neologisms. Best bet is PROD it for deletion, but give it a day or so to see if anything materialises. Ged  UK  20:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr Flash
A tag has been placed on Mr Flash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 10:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hang on! Coolug (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Mr Flash
Please would you expand on this article and add some sources. Otherwise I will need to propose deletion for lack of notability. LittleOldMe (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Too late! I see that someone else has already tagged it as I was composing my note to you. LittleOldMe (talk) 10:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * As you may have noticed, I've added a hangon thing and am in the process of adding some notability. Coolug (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I've sandboxed it here. Please read this before you decide whether to recreate. As it stands, there is no evidence he is notable enough.  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  18:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for sandboxing it. Be right back. Coolug (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Buggy Rollin'
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Buggy Rollin', a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 20:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello. I tagged it as such because as the article looked to me, the subject was completely made up. No references or anything to back it up. I've noted that since then someone else has deleted the article for another reason. Cya Coolug (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Because I afterwards discovered that it was a copyright violation so I warned the user accordingly (which is also something important) and let somebody else check and delete it. So they we're ignorant (of Copyright) but not malicious. Anyways, no sweat and thanks for helping with the new pages. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD - Pearlism
I have declined your speedy deletion on this, because it is not really a hoax (which implies intent to deceive); it's silly, and not notable, but those are not speedy reasons, and nor (unfortunately) is WP:NFT. I have PRODded it, instead.

Another point about speedy tagging: you should copy to the author's talk page the warning which is generated automatically as part of the speedy template on the article. Otherwise the newbie author doesn't know what's happened, thinks he pressed the wrong button, and often just puts the article in again. Also, if it's a new contributor who has never had a Welcome template, it's useful to give one before the speedy warning - it makes it less BITEy, and gives useful links that may help him do better next time. is a good one. Keep up the good work - New Page Patrol needs all the eyes it can get! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Julia Mulligan


The article Julia Mulligan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * "prospective candidate" doesn't meet WP's notability requirements

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 10:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judith Blake


The article Judith Blake has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet notability guidelines under WP:POLITICIAN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Miyagawa  (talk)  11:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just an FYI, I speedily deleted this per G4 criteria, as it was deleted previously as a result of a deletion discussion. If you come across an article deleted via AfD, don't recreate it unless you can address the problems being cited in the deletion discussion. Thank you. --  At am a  頭 22:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Chris Grayling
I added the reference for the Daily Politics episode. Tiller54 (talk) 10:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks :) Coolug (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Talk:Mr Flash
Hi Coolug, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Mr Flash. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot  (msg) 00:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

RE:Human centipede
Hi there. It's alright if you wanna add back the RT and Metacritic ratings later. But is there any reason for getting rid of the Metacritic link? --Artoasis (talk) 06:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point, let's put that back. Thanks Coolug (talk) 06:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

B-class
I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but I will do later hopefully. I've also added rollback to your account because the article is constantly being vandalised. Make sure you only use rollback to deal with obvious, blatant vandalism. Read WP:Rollback before you use it! Papa November (talk) 07:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * wow thanks. Don't worry, I will only use my new power for good! Coolug (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Hige Danshaku
First, they are not a band, so db-band is not the proper rationale. Second, I mistakenly pressed save while I was in the process of finishing the article and it's not going to be deleted now anyway.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 16:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Righty ho, although from the article there doesn't seem to be any clear notability regarding this duo so I would suggest finding some third-party sources pronto in order to save this article from those over zealous editors among us who like to tag things for deletion. Cya Coolug (talk) 16:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Even though I'm not going to be copying down their extensive talkshow appearances from the Japanese entry, I've found enough references that support the notability.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 17:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Great! Give it a few decent third-party refs from reputable sources and you have successfully given birth a a fully fledged wikipedia article. Good work. Coolug (talk) 17:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * BTW - do you have any english language refs? these will probably be more helpful for most english speaking wikipedia readers. Coolug (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Why would they be necessary for a Japanese subject matter?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The thing about wikipedia is that because anyone can edit it, it's liable to being full of rubbish. By having the sources made clear the reader is able to check out the information given and see for themselves where the writer found this information. Therefore wherever possible the source should be in an accessible language. See Yukio Hatoyama for example, the sources are mostly in English because if they were in Japanese then 99% of English Wikipedia readers (who don't speak Japanese) would have no way of working out if the article could be considered reliable or not. Coolug (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

limbo skating
Why did you mark my article as “vandalism”? The sport exists. I didn't make it up. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion. -- Sloyment (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * it sounded like rubbish to me, but I accept I must have been mistaken. Since the sport exists you should be able to find lots of decent third sources to back up your article, maybe a newspaper article on the sport. Good luck with the article! Coolug (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Flame (Johnny Duhan album)
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Flame (Johnny Duhan album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''A9 only applies where the artist has no article, but Johnny Duhan has. It may well not pass WP:NALBUMS, but it's not speediable; consider PROD or AfD.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks, I shall remember that in future. cya Coolug (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Russula foetens
Thank you. I was just writing this article in Wikipedia in Spanish and... :S... perhaps I made a mistake when I pressed the button...and save that in this Wikipedia. Thank you very much for being so effective and quick to put the signal. I'm sorry very much. Please forgive my bloomer. Best regards. Tirithel (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * that's ok. Don't worry about it. cya Coolug (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Drheiteraward14062010.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Drheiteraward14062010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Baleeted Papa November (talk) 09:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Decoration for the 'Dr Heiter Award'.png
Thank you for uploading File:Decoration for the 'Dr Heiter Award'.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 08:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Benny the Chef
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Benny the Chef, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: writer whose won awards is an assertion of importance. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  21:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, when I tagged it there was nothing to back any of the claims up so I thought it non-notable. Thanks for keeping my updated. Cya Coolug (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK but remember for speedy deletion the threshold isn't notability, its the much lower threshold of whether the article "asserts importance or significance"  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  22:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Cryoshell (Band)
Hi! Just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of Cryoshell (Band), as they have made an assertion of notability (use of their music by Lego). Please remember that if an article makes a credible assertion of notability (which is not as strict as a verifiable referenced claim), then the article cannot be speedily delete under A7. I would suggest PROD/AFD/Improve. Stephen! Coming... 09:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Test design
Hi. Could you provide more information about why you marked this article to be eligible for speedy deletion under the no-context rule? I think I have enough context to it. If you could provide me with more information about what you think is missing, I could look into adding it. Thanks. JnRouvignac (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: India International Friendship Society
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of India International Friendship Society, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Ged UK  18:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Costas Zapas
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Costas Zapas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Ged UK  20:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mood Media
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mood Media, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ged UK  20:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: María Calderón
I added a ref in order to remove the BLP-deletion tag. I'd just created the article moments before with a few sentences. Also, she's been dead since 1646 :) -- LaNaranja (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, it was a prod for deletion not speedy, because there were no references. But now there are it's ok. Good luck with the article. cya Coolug (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy notification
Hi Coolug. I see you tagged for speedy deletion A Marshall Mackenzie; however, given this edit by the article's creator, I thought best to userfy said article; hope you don't mind. Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 16:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for Gerald Reid
Hi. I noticed that you placed a db-bio tag on Gerald Reid barely a minute after its creation. Please remember that many articles are created in stages. The layout of the article suggests that the editor in question is either new, or is actively working on it. Please allow the editor a few minutes to see whether things happen, as per WP:CSD. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 20:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that's fair enough, it's this damn twinkle, makes it far too easy! I will try and lay off immediate tagging of articles that might be in progress and aren't obviously some teenagers resume. Thanks for the advice. cya Coolug (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, mis-twinkled a few times too then shuffled back and apologized... Just remember, with great power comes great responsibility. It's not about who can tag the most, it's about improving Wikipedia's quality overall. Have fun! Moocha (talk) 20:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

BLP tagging on Jon Trondson Benkestok
Hi. I noticed you tagged Jon Trondson Benkestok as PROD BLP. That policy applies to living people. The article was about a person who has been dead for about five centuries. Please be more careful, and please do not bite the newcomers. Thanks. Moocha (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahem, four centuries, and I can't count. Bah :). Moocha (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

BLP prod to Christopher peacock home
I have declined this BLP prod as the article was actually about a company; also it did actually have a link to a source. Feel free to prod it by the standard route if you still consider it merits deletion rather than improvement. I have moved it to Christopher Peacock Cabinetry. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

I have cited the bio
On my Wikipedia page, Nicholas Anthony Ascioti, it was tagged for not citing the source. So I did, and got the message again. I don't know what I am doing wrong, but I hope I fixed it.

Thanks, Anthony Guidetti (talk) 22:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations on receiving the Dr. Heiter Award!


Hi there, thank you for your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence). When the article was first started in October 2009 is was but a tiny stub that was immediately tagged for deletion, but thanks to the efforts of wikipedia editors that tiny acorn has grown into a great oak tree of an article. The Human Centipede (First Sequence) now has B-Class status and on the 17th June 2010 the article received its 1,000,000th page view!

The Dr. Heiter Award was created to reward editors who have made positive contributions to the article. It can be presented by any wikipedia user to anyone who has helped the article grow. This might be by adding new content, fixing any errors or reverting vandalism.

Thanks!

Papa November (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

(I can assure you that this award was not made under duress. Papa November (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC))

Thanks! This has actually brought a little tear to my eye. I'm far too emotional about stuff. Hooray! Coolug (talk) 16:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Notre jour viendra cover.png
Thanks for uploading File:Notre jour viendra cover.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for telling me how to do this, I think I've sorted it now. cya Coolug (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Junie B. Jones is a party animal
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Junie B. Jones is a party animal to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok that's cool. Thanks for letting me know. cya Coolug (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Daniel Callahan, Ph.D
Hello, Coolug. You sent me a notification telling me that my newly created article Daniel Callahan, Ph.D was proposed for deletion. Thank you for letting me know about this, I`ll work on providing a reliable source right away. MetaCow (talk) 21:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, the tag was because there were no references on the article, anyway,it seems there was already an article on Daniel Callahan so I've made a redirect. cya Coolug (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. I did not realize there was already an article on Daniel Callahan.MetaCow (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jason Merchant
Hello Coolug. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jason Merchant, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of it contained a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  12:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Its Not March!
Hello You said that all articles made in March 2010 well it s November sorry to sound rude but all my articles get deleted so I'm not to happy about that.--Gertie1999 (talk) 13:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999
 * Erm.... I presume you mean there was a BLP tag put on an article you wrote. This says any biographical article created *since* march 2010 needs to have references to avoid getting the chop. Not made during the month of march, as you have correctly identified that it is in fact no longer march would be rather silly. As for all your articles getting deleted, I'm afraid I have no idea whatsoever why this might be. Make sure you properly cite the things you are saying in articles to prove that what you are saying is true and the subject really is important enough as to have it's own wikipedia article. Good luck with your articles. cya Coolug (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you but thanks for the logical Explanation--Gertie1999 (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999

Fateh Khan Awan
Hi Coolug, I'm afraid there was a problem with your attempt to delete Fateh Khan Awan as sticky prods are only for articles on living people, not buried ones.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  19:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * oops, sorry, didn't read last sentence about the buried bit. Thanks for letting me know. cya Coolug (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Man. Wait. I'm editing this. Don't add stupid ads when I am editing this article.

--ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I would recommend you make sure there are some secondary sources on this article suggesting why this person is actually notable (not just his own website) to make sure no-one else sticks a BLP PROD on it. Good luck with the article. Coolug (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Gulli.com
I have declined the speedy deletion tag here - it is clearly not an advertisement. Please be more careful in the future. Ironholds (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Can I point out that we might want to give more than ONE minute for people to develop an article? Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * if you have enough time to be looking at what's in a rather unimportant editors talk page archive, then firstly I do pity you, but secondly, you may have noticed that I've buried this in my user archive without waiting for the bot to do it for me after 90 days. This is because it's a little embarrasing to be effectlive told off by some one from the Wikimedia foundation. However, it also seems a little extreme, ok so I fucked up and added a tag without properly investigating the article, I'm sorry, but do I really have to be yelled at by some Wikimedia bigshot? Isn't that a bit extreme? Is there something we haven't been told? :P Coolug (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In order;


 * 1) Philippe poked you before you archived it, as did I (I note you didn't respond to that);
 * 2) Philippe's userpage makes clear that "I am the Head of Reader Relations for the Wikimedia Foundation, 'though my work on this username is typically in my reversible capacity as a volunteer. If it's an official action it will be clearly labeled" (bolding is mine);
 * 3) We have a real problem with retaining new editors through Special:NewPages, and part of it is the reaction they get from New Page Patrollers. You might consider ameliorating your work rather than shooting the messenger. Ironholds (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Humansexipedecensoredcover311210.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Humansexipedecensoredcover311210.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * done. Thanks for your help image bot! Now off to my new years party! Coolug (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Civilization (Justice song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Civilization (Justice song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Civilization (Justice song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  21:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Justicecivilization10032011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Justicecivilization10032011.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have sorted it. You made two mistakes:
 * You shouldn't link the article in the fair-use rationale. Just write its name
 * You need an image copyright tag AND a fair-use rationale.
 * Papa November (talk) 12:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Papa November! cya Coolug (talk) 20:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

The Human Centipede (First Sequence) GA review
Just to let you know that I have completed the GA review for The Human Centipede (First Sequence) and have placed it on hold pending a few issues which need to be addressed. Please see Talk:The Human Centipede (First Sequence)/GA1 or alternatively go to Talk:The Human Centipede (First Sequence) for details. Thank you, –MuZemike 04:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Archive 4
I have replied to your comment there. Please be aware that manual archiving breaks the attribution chain and is actually a copyright violation. Please do it automatically, or through the move function, and not through copypasting. Ironholds (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments with regard to archiving which have been noted and I shall try my utmost to adhere to in future. I am afraid I was not aware of the potential copyright issues with manual copy and pasting of content like that. I shall also strive to use the word 'ameliorate' in place of the more commonly used 'improve' in speech tomorrow. Thank you Coolug (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You might also want to actually address the issue that was raised. Ironholds (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1 - I did not respond to the messages on my talk page because I felt there was no point, I was clearly at fault in tagging the article, and felt there was no worth in attempting to defend my actions. Frankly I do not really engage in a great deal of talk page debates which I imagine you can see from my contribution history. I wrote a message on the archive explaining why I had manually archived the messages (which I now realise was a potential violation of copyright and thus something I should not have done) just in case anyone out there wondered what someone was doing writing new content on an archive page. I did not expect many people to actually care enough that I had done so, but because some of my real world friends occasionally look at my wikipedia contribution history I decided I had better explain myself.
 * 2 - I am afraid I did not read Philippe's userpage as thoroughly as I should have. Unfortunately upon seeing a job title I jumped to conclusions and did not take the time to completely consider everything surrounding this event.
 * 3 - I understand the concerns regarding retaining new users and over zealous new page patrollers. Perhaps a new system of new pages patrolling could be implemented where a tag regarding the deletion of a page will not be approved until more than one reviewer has expressed the same concern. I imagine that wouldn't be an especially difficult feature for wikipedia to create. However, if I am mistaken then please accept my apologies.
 * Regards Coolug (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, enough of this silliness. I agree wholeheartedly that biting new editors is a big no-no. Overzealous CSD tagging is clearly a bad way to go, and Coolug has acknowledged his mistake. However, remember that there is currently a big drive to get more people involved in routine maintenance, and we're constantly struggling to overcome a massive backlog of cleanup tasks. WP:BITE applies equally strongly to new editors who are trying out new maintenance tasks. Surely, Coolug will be less keen to get involved in new maintenance tasks when two admins (including a WMF member) are bearing down on him with all-caps shouting, and frivolous accusations of copyright violation. Moving a signed and dated talk page comment (along with its signature) to an obvious archive subpage, is not breaking the attribution chain. The only feasible reason for berating the user about this is to belittle him, and frankly, as administrators we should be above that.

A simple, kind word of advice would have been more appropriate. Let the guy learn from his mistakes, and potentially develop into a valuable member of the cleanup/maintenance community. I'm a friend of Coolug in real life, so take this as being a biased, one-sided view if you will. Papa November (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite right. Coolug, as far as I'm concerned, it's over and you're okay in my book for admitting an error.  I hope you don't honestly think I'm some "Wikipedia Big Shot", as I think you said, because thats not accurate.  What I ~am~ is passionate about converting readers into editors.  I hope you'll excuse any over-zealous language and read my comments in that spirit.  - Philippe  12:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

The Human Centipede GA
Congratulations on getting that article up to GA status! I've been following it for some time, but was too busy to help out - articles like that are what makes WP great, at least to me, so thanks for all the effort you put in! Cheers, Pim Rijkee (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey thanks! I'm really pleased we managed to get the article up to GA. I've got to confess that I do find it really amusing that such a horrible horrible film has such a good wikipedia article, the next step is Featured Article :)
 * I've put the article up for Peer Review and hopefully there will be some good constructive feedback from other editors that can be used to push the article to the big league, as ever any help is always appreciated!


 * anyway, thanks for the message, cya Coolug (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Doherty
Please keep your personal opinion about living people out of your comments, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 17:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Terribly sorry. I confess that having spent much of 2002-4 being excited about libertines gigs, I feel very jaded about the Peter Doherty of late as he willingly wastes his entire life away. Will try to reframe from similar actions in future. cya Coolug (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, the artist is often difficult to portray and easily misrepresented, and he clearly has ongoing issues, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only '''5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The Human Centipede
Thank you for the compliment. I don't believe, however, that explicit credit in an article caption is required to fulfill attribution. If I understand correctly, merely linking to the photo's own page constitutes sufficient attribution under the Attribution 3.0 license. Since all photos on Wikipedia already do this, credit is usually not given in captions on Wikipedia, unless the photographer himself is noteworthy, like Ansel Adams. For this reason, I never credit myself when adding my pics to articles. Good luck with FA! Nightscream (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! cya Coolug (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Ryan Giggs
If the Spanish media had actually seen the super-injunction, they would not need to use the word "allegedly" in the best traditions of Have I Got News for You. This looks like more speculative web trawling, the sourcing would have to be much better than this.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 17:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I thought I'd give it a go seeing as the source seemed to me to be reliable, but I understand why you've reverted this. Cya Coolug (talk) 17:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

hey coolug it sadly got deleted so i guess ill get some reviews on it to the publishing office away! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dserra916 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * well good luck with your unpublished novel. I'm sure once it's sold by the truckload and won numerous awards some other user will make a wikipedia article about it. cya Coolug (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

thanks dude —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dserra916 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

THC FAC
You might want to leave a brief note at WT:FILM and WT:HORROR notifying people about the FAC. It has been going on for a long time now! Papa November (talk) 06:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * good idea, done. cya Coolug (talk) 09:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

McLaren
Hi Coolug. Thanks for your additions to F1 race reports. One tiny point to note is that "McLaren" has a capital "L". But apart from that, keep up the good work. DH85868993 (talk) 03:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * oops! Sorry, that makes me feel a like a bit of an amateur, I'm supposed to be a fan off this stuff. Thanks for the heads up. cya Coolug (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Human centipede
It is the consensus of Project film editors that critical commentary IS the article itself (per Rfc in January). Whether other member accept that or not is still not clear, but I have started a discussion on the MOS page of the project to attemtpt to get the MOS to be clearer and more precise about how to handle cover art by the project standards. So no.. the article does not need to discuss the poster in the eyes of consensus. I accept that. Hopefully the project can actualy state it in the MOS.

The other two image are not discussed in the prose and captioning does NOT count as prose. They are decorative, especialy the actor shot. Nowhere in that section does it discuss that image or what it is. Just being the actors is not enough. It must have prose about what the image is beyond just a portrait. Portraits can only be used in the infobox of biographies.

As for the poster it does not need any further prose per consensus but you have only provided the boilerplate for Fair use. That is simply the beginning of what is required (the boilerplate itself is not required, the information is) such as description author and source information. Wikipedia requires a ten point rationale for all fair use images. 4 of those points are Fair Use law, the most important being that it not take market value. It is the opinion of this editor that the poster does take market use away from the copyright holder to license the image to identify the film in reviews, blogs and media. You made a free copy and it henders the market value of the NEW film.--Amadscientist (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * --Amadscientist (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)You have a lot of work on that article and I did not delist it over two images but it can be de-listed over the issue alone if someone were to feel strongly or if more issues arise.


 * Hey, I hope you don't mind, but as this piece follows on from a discussion on the human centipede talk page, I'm going to paste it over there. Coolug (talk) 13:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * FYI, per Manual of Style (dates and numbers), you only need to do date number and month. The year does not have to be inside the nowrap template. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 19:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence)
Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Human Centipede
Thanks for the message. Nightscream (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Human centipede

 * Hey thanks! Although I don't think you actually caused any errors (I think the errors were already there) but I've never had a proper barnstar before, so I'll take it! cya Coolug (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)