User talk:Coolvanillaboy

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Verdict for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. SteveLamacq43 15:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Overheadsuplex.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Overheadsuplex.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 01:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Brocklesnar 2003 house show.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Brocklesnar 2003 house show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ Bigr  Tex  21:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

The following images meet the same requirements and have also been tagged: ~ Bigr  Tex  21:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:F 5 .jpg
 * Image:Eddy11.gif
 * Image:Brockback.jpg
 * Image:Neck.gif
 * Image:Lesnarvsbigshow.jpg
 * Image:Showf5.gif
 * Image:Showbelly.gif

You have removed several user warnings from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. Thank you. MKoltnow 19:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

well they are still annoying -- Coolvanillaboy

Refrences and removal of sections
DO NO REMOVE IN TEXT REFERENCES AND LARGE SECTIONS OF TEXT... references are a large part of wikipedia articles there is no reason to remove them from the text like that. As for the sections, though that is your oppinion the removal of large sections like that cannot just be performed like that without some sort of lengthy disscussion --- Paulley 19:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What!!!!! why make a large edit that removes them if you dont mind them being there... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paulley (talk • contribs) 19:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Your removing sections for no reason, your removing perfectly usable free use images.. its vandalism and i wont let you do it --- Paulley

Do you even look at your edit
Do you even look at your edit... this is your edit tell me what part is helpful to the article --- Paulley 19:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Look at your edit that's all im asking.. its got nothing to do with what you know about him as your not adding anything!!! --- Paulley

I look at my damn edits everytime dude tell me what the fuck is wrong (nothing is) so fuck off dammit! -- Coolvanillaboy

ok then...
 * the removal of sources
 * the removal of sections of text
 * the removal of the inter language wiki link
 * The removal of a free use image
 * and thats all you have done... what part of that is good -- Paulley

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by vandalism and incivility (24-hr block). If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. El_C 20:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.

Vandlism
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked.

I havent vandalised anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolvanillaboy (talk • contribs)
 * Yes you have see this You are removing refences & large parts of text with no edit summary or reason. DXRAW 01:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I havent deleted any information about brock lesnar infact i wrote most of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolvanillaboy (talk • contribs)
 * You have deleted refences and writing most of it does not allow you to delete most of it. As it says at the bottom of the page "You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." DXRAW 01:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

dude you dont know what you are talking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolvanillaboy (talk • contribs)
 * In a nutshell, STOP reverting the page. DXRAW 01:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

so you want me to stop editing huh? well i got news for ya it aint gonna happen so back off.

Fair Use
Final Warning Stop reinserting images which have been removed because of legal and fair use concerns. Your actions can be seen as vandalism. If you do the same thing again you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- bullet proof  3:16 05:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Removing Warnings
You have removed several user warnings from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. Thank you. -- bullet proof  3:16 05:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing warnings. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * One more removal of warnings or edits such as this and you will be blocked indefinitely. Please stop. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I am not stalking you. I am an admin trying to be as instructive as I can be. Wikipedia is not a message board. Posts like the one I referenced above are not ok here. So please stop or you will be blocked. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 48 hours
For constant incivility and policy violations. I was originally going to make the block indefinite but you do have some constructive edits. You just need to learn how to interact with others on here. This is probably your last chance to shape up. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It has been extended to indefinite. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

That seems fair but can´t we make it a month instead of three?


 * We have pretty solid proof that you are both Martin181 and Rockaway360 and that you've been doing what amounts to a sockpuppet relay race the last few weeks. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes this time to also proof that i am indeed going to improve stop doing accounts etc i am admitting i was those users but im not going that way any longer im going to have this account and be a good member to wikipedia thats why i ask for a last chance i wont dissapoint either if i screw up again which i dont this ip address from sweden will never bother wikipedia again i promise. Coolvanillaboy 07:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Three months is already a compromise. More usual would be one year.  --Yamla 20:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Due to continued unblock requests, it would now be inappropriate to unblock this user until at least a year has passed. --Yamla 19:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Yamla is cruel and disruptive and should not be given as he wants.