User talk:Coonman

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut was changed by Coonman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932149 on 2015-04-23T02:28:02+00:00.

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Amy Poehler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joss Whedon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joss Whedon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water. Diff: No indication from existing, sourced content that the SpongeBob sequel uses traditional animation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)