User talk:Cooper-42/Archive 1

Slimvirgin's talk page
Just to let you know, SV never addresses any points raised about her behavior that is remotely negative. She merely reverts the page as vandalism. Trying to reason with her is like trying to defecate up a space elevator. Just wanted you to know. :) E. Sn0 =31337= 07:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Good Work on the Human Geography Stubs
AlexD 16:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject query
Hi there, I am doing some clean up on the list of proposed WikiProjects. I noticed that WikiProject Children and Youth Issues has been listed for more than 60 days. Unless you object, I would like to remove it from the list since it is unlikely to receive further feedback. Thanks! -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 14:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Interested?
You might want to check out the TfD talk section. - Freechild 05:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Children and youth issues
Hey Cooper-42, I just found your work page on children and youth issues, and I want to find out if you're still interested in moving forward on this project. I think we could hone it in on children's rights or youth voice or any specific area inside of what you proposed on your page, but I would be interested in knowing if you're still keen on the idea. • Freechild   'sup?   14:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Worms (video game) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 14:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Worms scrapyardscreenshot.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Worms scrapyardscreenshot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

hey
Because of your user name, If feel you are a perfect candidate to join 42 please take a look and apply to join if you would like-- Pewwer42 Talk  07:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the nice note, it's always appreciated.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

'MA in Geography'
You should be careful with that user box Nick. You might fail your MA miserably. Then you'd have egg on your virtual face. --Pretty Green (talk) 16:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Dream17
Ello. Thanks for you message. I removed D17 links as there is no longer a Dream17 wiki entry. As for the reflist, I removed these because I didn't believe that a 3rd party, dream17, was a valid source and was just more self promotion when there are more official sources, ie Team17, Sega, etc. I can see how my edits would seem a little over enthusiastic, I should have added the alternate official references instead, and will look to fixing this. --CheechFu (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Help on Geography Wikiproject
Hi - I've come to you as I've been going down the list of WP:GEOG members looking for someone online (so I know is editing today - it's Sat afternoon in the UK!). Have you seen this? Perhaps you could help. Regards, --Matt Lewis (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Culture
Hi, I just did a major overhaul of this article. I was actually fairly conservative - just deleting fringe views, repetitions, unrelated material, and trying to reorganize what was left in order to sort out distinct POVs, and approaches. What is now left needs up-dating and expansion, but at least I hope there is a framework that accommodates all major POVs .... except, I did not create a section on cultural geography and I think we need a section, along with an explanation of how geographers define and study culture in distinction from anthropologists and cultural studies. I explain myself more fully on the talk page. Can you help? Thanks

Added by: Slrubenstein

I agree with everything you wrote on the talk:culture page. Would you mind working up something(s) to add to the article? Some anthropologists have also talked about the spatialization of culture ... I will comment on the talk page. You say you are not the best qualified, but frankly I think there are few people at Wikipedia who know much about cultural geography. From what I have seen you know more than most. Maybe you can write up something and invite others who know more about cultural geography to develop it? I think a brief account of how cultural geographers approach culture, and then a subsection on the spatial dimensions of culture, would be great!! Slrubenstein  |  Talk 17:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect Social geography → Human geography
Hi, I've commented on your rationale concerning the redirect on the article's talk page. I'm going to expand this to a stub, since there's no doubt that this is an established term. Regards, --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 15:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation
Greetings Cooper-42-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Introversion Software, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Darwinia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)