User talk:Cooper Justin/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Advanced Steam Technology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_steam_technology

I have chosen steam technology because i feel it has disappeared even though they found the source to be

Lead

The lead sentence does start off explaining about the steam engines technical development and soon the demise of the technology.It does seem to bounce from one information to the next that could confuse the reader.

Content

The content breakdown is explained clearly where to read, but confusing and not to much information on each part. The Holcroft and Anderson content seems to be the most descriptive and easy to follow. It explains the history and ways the steam was improved.

Tone and Balance

Seems to me that the article is suggesting how steam technology could help affect the difference in our gasses that we put in the air. The article heavily inputs how maintenance is big with using steam and how it would take some work to get it progressed.

Sources and References

Sources are cited and easy to find, also references for other articles are added. Seems like you could go from article to article to continue your research easily. Plenty of sources in article to verify all content.

Organization

Article seems very well structured and easy to navigate, seemed to flow from section to section. Some articles could have had more details but kept the reader interested in learning more.

Images and media

Very little images, only 2 that i could see, may have been more appealing to see what im reading about. Reading an article is fun to learn but seeing the actual pictures of what your reading draws the imagination.

Checking the talk page

The articles had alot of strengths, seems like the citations and references to other articles make the article an abundance to read. The other talk people think the intro paragraph was a little weak and could have had a stronger beginning and be more referenced in what the topic was. A couple other people wanted to know what other forms of steam may have been introduced into the article.

Overall impressions

I felt the article had alot of good info to soak in. I enjoyed reading about the steam technology and learning more about an area that i have not had the pleasure of researching on.

Peer Review Assignment 6
Justin Cooper reviewed Ethan Toomey article. Cooper Justin (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Assignment 7 Completed
Reviewing Timothy Reillys peer review is actually very well compelling, i didnt think about the ways of the cheats that affect other gamers. I like that he focused on the ethics of the cheats and how and when they are appropriate. I think im going to focus a portion of my topic on that, it would bring light to the new ways of gaming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooper Justin (talk • contribs) 02:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)