User talk:CopSuscept

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571486122 your edit] to Ramdev may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ramdev and his aide Acharya Balkrishna in the wake of dreadful diseases being cured by Ramdev's pranayama and his Ayurvedic medicines.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Copy paste
Isn't this a copy paste from the book? Isn't that a copyright violation? If I'm wrong, please say and accept my apologies. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Anna. The quotation is from a historical book.--CopSuscept (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay. I guess all the single and double quotes confused me. Thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I am very tired since I didn't sleep last night. I rephrased my edit. Thanks.--CopSuscept (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

CopSuscept, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hello, I'm Mar4d. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Abdus Salam. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. S M S  Talk 02:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. S M S  Talk 12:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Warning
-- S M S  Talk 14:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at State-sponsored terrorism. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)