User talk:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Draft:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://cpsc.ku.dk/About/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Copenhagen Plant Science Centre


Hello, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Copenhagen Plant Science Centre".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 04:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. - GB fan 12:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Here's a few key questions: You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a subject that you are trying to create an article about, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to break the 3 important questions above. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?
 * I do not believe they should be unblocked until they confirm that they understand conflict of interest. - GB fan 01:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree; that is the point of posing the three questions. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft
Hi, We're an Encyclopaedia ... Not the WP:YELLOWPAGES, If and when your company becomes notable an article will be created by a neutral editor, Your draft here here won't ever be "undeleted" because you obviously work for the company, As you're only here for one thing I don't believe unblocking wouldn't benefit the project unless you ofcourse start editing articles that aren't related to your company, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 13:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * As you are not an administrator I would be grateful if you would refrain from posting edits, such as the one above, which will give editors the impression that you have an admin ability. If you really must comment on block requests you should make it clear in your edit that your comment is merely advisory, and has no official standing. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 23:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * - My sincerest apologies for that - That was never my intention, In hindsight as I reverted their refund request I should've made it much clearer and infuture If I make any edits like the above I will obviously make it much clearer, Again my apologies for that, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)