User talk:Copy Editor

Speedy deletion nomination of Copy Editor Talk page archive


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 04:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Eric Bowles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Bowles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eric Bowles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Omni Flames  let's talk about it  10:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Lucinda Reddick Bassett
You could have just 'moved' it... 8-) Peridon (talk) 22:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucinda Bassett for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucinda Bassett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lucinda Bassett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice: post-1932 American politics
Reverse racism falls within this topic area. Thank you. –Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm SimLibrarian. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Living Enrichment Center have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. SimLibrarian (talk) 19:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)