User talk:Corbyjw

Speedy deletion nomination of Corby Waste


A tag has been placed on Corby Waste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, Corbyjw. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Corby Waste, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Notability
Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia. Just so you know, saying that an article "lacks notability" is not the same thing as saying the subject of the article is not important. Notability is established by independent, reliable, third party sources talking about the subject. So, cite some magazine articles or newspaper articles and you should be fine. If there aren't any, then your subject is not ready to have a Wikipedia article at this time. Again, none of this is to imply that the work of the subject of your article isn't important or good. You could think of the term "notability" as the Wikipedia community term for their standards for inclusion. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:23, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Corby Waste. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corby Waste


The article Corby Waste has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No multiple,  in-depth reliable third party  sources have been found to  support Wikipedia criteria for notability per WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

JPL images on Commons
I suggest that you look at the images created by JPL artists that are on WP Commons, at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jet_Propulsion_Laboratory. It looks like most of them are not credited to an individual artist, while at least some of them had a credit line for the artist on the JPL source page. It would not be WP:OR or WP:COI to add that information to the files, as long as it is shown at the source site, or if you can provide some other reliable source. I suggest that you do that for images by all of the JPL artists. I don't think that it would be appropriate to add credit lines to the captions in the articles where the images are used, unless there is significant RS coverage of the specific image and its artist.--Hjal (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)