User talk:Coredesat/Archive 5

Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!

Actually, it's a couple of new episodes. I've been moving to an place closer to campus (my commute was getting to me) and hence, the reminder message was a little slow in coming out. So slow we put out 2 where before we had 1.

Anyways, all is good now, here's the new episodes!


 * Episode 9 MP3
 * Episode 9 OGG


 * Episode 8 MP3
 * Episode 8 OGG

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 05:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

Werdnabot
thanks for the quick block. Working on it &mdash; Werdna talk criticism 06:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Schools
Hi, I also nominated Somerset High School (Massachusetts) for a speedy for WP:NN and it was deleted. Perhaps this deletion should be reviewed? How does one find the deletion log once the article has been deleted? If I had found it then I would have contacted the administrator who deleted it.

Also, could you point me to a guideline or discussion on what the minimum requirements are for a school. I don't want to make the same mistake again. Thanks LittleOldMe 14:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Typhoon Chanchu
I think you forgot to move the talk page with this one. Good kitty 20:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Deletion?
Good day, i'd like to know why was woop clan article deleted by you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wykis (talk • contribs) 21:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC).

Moving pages
Can you please move Hurricane Ilsa and Hurricane Norman to Tropical Storm such and such, because Southern Hemisphere storms are included in both of them? Thanks. By the way, isn't there a page where I can make a request for moving pages instead of asking an admin in a talk page? RaNdOm26 04:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

95A.INVEST
Could you please check the Latitude for 95A.INVEST. I think it is 0.2N but Chachor says 2N. I have checked on NRL as well as FNMOC --Ugaap 17:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your clarification about the location of 95A.INVEST at 0.2N . Also I would appreciate if you can inform Chachor not to bite me. --Ugaap 05:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

"Egyptians" AfD
You closed the Controversy over racial characteristics of ancient Egyptians AfD with a simple "keep" and a recommendation for an RfC. I'm not contesting that decision, as it was the correct one, in my opinion. Still, there is some debate amoung the interested editors on what the conditions (if any) were for that decision. The article is well into another edit war with one 3RR block already handed out. If you could close (re-close?) this AfD with a little more descriptive judgement it would probably go a long way toward avoiding future conflict on the article and provide a starting point for future work. Thanks! NeoFreak 09:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. I was hoping that you could pass some judgement on wether or not the keep hinged on a reversion to a previous version but I suppose that will come out in the RfC. Thanks again. NeoFreak 05:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

The Lemon List AfD
Amazing *puppetry, no? Not sure if there's an appropriate warning you could issue, but it now appears, based on this comment from the originator of the now-deleted article, that the whole thing was a WP:POINT stunt. DMacks 00:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The IP you just blocked, 58.187.86.16
User talk:58.187.86.16 just personally attacked User:Someguy0830 on the IP's talk page after you blocked it. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking care of it! Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 04:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For this. --Guinnog 05:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Closure
The edit sum you left says that I closed it early but it was opened on Dec 14, 06 and I closed it on Dec 19 which is five days. Titoxd said I shouldn't close ones like that and I won't again but I didn't close it early. Thanx.--John Lake 00:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

South Asia Analysis Group
Hello ... this is a case of a blatant WP:COPYVIO (the fourth paragraph is copied in its entirety from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/southasia/cuvl/govt.html, one of the references) but another editor is accusing me of vandalism for flagging it and has reverted my attempts to mark it for notability and db-copyvio ... please help. --72.75.72.174 08:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: As you can see on Talk:South Asia Analysis Group, the rest of the article is even more obviously copied from a 2nd website. --72.75.72.174 13:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Islamonline.net
Would you please have a look at the history and talk page of this article since you closed the AfD and tagged it? User:Mak82hyd has been reverting edits and tags, including a db-copyvio added after they reverted the removal of the copyrighted material (they seem unclear on the concept of copy&paste from websites with a copyright notice) ... they have done nothing but revert all attempts to improve the article since the AfD was closed, and have even removed the  unencyclopedic tone tag you placed there! &mdash;72.75.72.174 20:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

coredesat, I have rewritten the article islamonline.net, removing copy stuff, can u please revert it. the new on is in temp. if u want me to further work on it please let me know. regards. Mak82hyd 21:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * replied on islamonline.net talk page. Mak82hyd 23:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Attempted cleanup
Hello, Coredesat - I posted a stripped-down version (from a reverted edit) at Talk:Islamonline.net/Temp ... the References section includes the notes from the first proposal, so only 8-11 would appear in this version.

Note that I have changed the External Reference of "article discussing IslamOnline.net and Yusuf al-Qardawi at length" to a cite journal reference for one of the assertions in the article (who runs it and where they are located), and even found a WikiBio for the author.

Now there is only one Alexa link (WP:EL - search engine results) instead of three (multiple references to the same source does not increase notability; a single link is sufficient, if properly placed), and only two ref's to the subject's own website instead of four, although it still looks like they're mostly blowing their own horn. &mdash; 13:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #7
After a long hiatus on my part, the December issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

RSMC importance
I agree that all should be raised to High (except PAGASA and CHC which should remain Mid, or go to Mid if Low currently). Feel free to go ahead, I am currently busy working on improving Hurricane Juan - now GA - to (hopefully) FA-class. CrazyC83 01:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Yo!
Thanks for the tip, bud. Hope you enjoy your Christmas. Maybe I'll get you something better than a card next year! LOL =p --Whatocean 05:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank-you
Thank-you for stepping in and taking care of that particular issue. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 06:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You might want to note that he is going through your contribs (oh no!) and making comments about your previous actions that do not involve him. :: Colin Keigher ( Talk ) 07:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I already noted that at ANI. I think it's time to start considering a longer-term block as he shows no signs of improving his conduct. – Chacor 07:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I unblocked User:Alan.a per his promise to stay away from the topic from now on. If you disagree with my choice, feel free to re-block and I won't interfere again. My hope here is that if he honors his agreement the entire problem will be solved. ---J.S  (T/C) 07:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Google Patents
Hi. I've undeleted this article, and am trying to make it more suitable as a reference article, and less of an advert for Google. Please feel free to review, or retag it if you do not agree. However, Brown truss references it, as does Image:Brown truss patent drawing image crop.png ++Lar: t/c 13:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC) (PS you can reply here, I watch... -L)

Angry Nintendo Nerd
Hi, I noticed you deleted a page entitled the Angry Nintendo Nerd. There have been a few pages on this person that have been deleted and I was wondering if the one you deleted was the one I contributed towards. I added a large list of the games he has reviewed and linked them to their correct pages. If it is, in fact, the page I contributed to, I'd like to know how I can fix it, as I believe it was very in depth and notable. --Donahue2 01:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

If that is the case, then please send me all of the article content and I will absolutly make it notable. I will also source it quite thuroughly. Please don't make me go through the trouble of typing the entire article up. Send me everthing that was on the page and I will be sure to revise it. Hopefully this is the page I contributed to. --Donahue2 07:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!

Episode 10, lots of new stuff, read about it online and not in this talkpage spam message :)

Anyways, all is good now, here's the new episodes!


 * Episode 10 MP3
 * Episode 10 OGG

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 07:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

Transnistria problems
Some problems appeared at Transnistria and Tiraspol articles:

Tiraspol problem: I added Pictures with Soviet Tank monument and Government building with statue of Lenin in front. Mauco replaced the latter with one in which the statue of Lenin can't be seen and removed the first, on arguments like "Your inclusion of the tank is POV." or " the city has only one such monument".

Transnistria problem: As there was quite a war edit, I added appropriate templates before all discussed paragraphs. Mauco reverted. I protested on Talk page, but Mauco never answered, although he edited Mauco reverts chapter.

I accuse Mauco of despising others point of view and I think that, by removing the templates, he opposed to a discussion meant to stop the war edit. Please judge this case.Dl.goe 08:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Chick Hicks
I checked WP:OR for information, but if the answer to my question is there, I missed it... so hopefully this won't be a ridiculous question. In the trivia for Chick Bowen it states he has a ridiculous number of sponsor decals. Would it be original research if I was able to count how many decals he has, and post the number? -WarthogDemon 21:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) (Though out of my own curiosity I'm gonna try and find it for myself!) At any rate, should I remove a piece of trivia from The King (Cars)?  Since it states he has 8. (Oh dear, that rhymes...) -WarthogDemon 22:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Protected broken redirects for deletion
Hi, I noticed you have been busy deleting pages marked for Speedy deletion. I have one that needs to be deleted but is fully protected. User talk:Bobaboba is a broken redirect and should be deleted. Would you do that for me please? Thanks so much, --Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Contribs) 22:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. --Core desat  22:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Islamonline.net
Can you please check the proposed alternatives and restore the article asap. its no good keeping it blocked. Mak82hyd 23:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

yeah
It looks to me like you just go around deleting everything you are not into. Someone had entered a page about a band I happen to play in. I noticed some of the info was wrong, so I updated it. You go and delete it calling it an "advertisement". We don't need a wiki ad when we're in Revolver magazine, moron. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomicmilk (talk • contribs)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Jesus
As I said to David: "Yeah, but it's only a proposed guideline, and not a guideline yet, and so far no one I've posted to has complained and I've only got thankful comments. The people I'm posting to seem generally open to an idea of a good article to edit such as Jesus and would probably like to know that it is the first item that comes up when you search for Jesus. Scifiintel 18:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Image talk:John F. MacArthur, Jr.jpg
Can you restore this? We've been trying to retain talk pages of deleted images. See Template talk:Replaceable fair use for some discussion on this. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  22:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

speedy?
Looks like recreation of recently deleted content at Traditional marriage. Same thing will probably happen at marriage (traditional) if it sits around. &mdash; coe l acan t a lk  &mdash; 01:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

You allowed yourself to be manipulated and used in a childish game. When you have time you should review the edits and the article Traditional marriage.--GMS508 04:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Traditional marriage
I was in the process of edited the article when you deleted it. The two articles were not the same. The article will be re-created with different material. I hope the "same sex marriage" POV pushers won't try to start another afd war. Nkras 02:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

You stated:"Please do not re-create articles that have been deleted in AFD discussions, as you did with Traditional marriage. The version that was just deleted (at Traditional Marriage) was identical to the article deleted at AFD, and violated general criterion 4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you wish to contest the deletion, you may file a deletion review. Continued identical re-creations may result in a block. --Coredesat 02:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)"

What good would it do? Nkras 02:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

No, it wasn't the same. I was editing the content. One article was "Traditional Marriage" (subject of afd), the article under edit was "Traditional marriage". That you have a userbox of "straight but not narrow" indicates a partisan belief. I am, in theory, to assume that you are supposed to act in good faith, but with what I've experienced in WP with the cultural left and their WP:GS and pro-Ssm enforcement squads, I doubt the credibility. You, as an autonomous Admin, have the unilateral power to censor, ban, or expunge any article or user you want to - based soley upon their traditionalist beliefs. I already explained my errors concerning the afd process with another admin, I do not think it necessary to repeat them to yet another Admin, ad infinitum. The Traditional marriage article will appear again in some form or another. Labeling it as a "fork" is just a euphemism for blatant POV censorship. Nkras 02:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

recreation of Traditional marriage
Hi. I understand that quick recreation of a recently deleted POV-fork would look like bad-faith editing, and a good justification for blocking the article. However, I think it was mistaken in this case.

I was not involved in the creation of the POV-fork, and I agree that deletion was the correct choice for the article. However, please review my comment in the afd discussion, this comment expressing the same idea, and this expression of support from a third user. The topic is a notable one that deserves neutral treatment in an article of its own.

Furthermore Nkras, the editor who created the POV-fork and caused such trouble for Coelacan and others, is a new user who started out on the wrong foot but has quickly become a much more constructive editor. I believe he is unlikely to create another tendentious version of the article. So I supported allowing recreation, either now or in a few days when tempers have further died down.

Dan B † Dan D 02:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I notice that as of this change:

Revision as of 18:56, 3 January 2007 (edit) Coredesat (Talk | contribs) m (Protected Traditional Marriage [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) ← Older edit 	Current revision (08:53, 5 January 2007) (edit) (undo) Mangojuice (Talk | contribs) (I feel a protected redirect is more appropriate here.) Line 1: 	Line 1: - 	 	+ 	#REDIRECTMarriage

The 'traditional marriage' article now redirects to 'marriage'. Would it make sense to use the 'traditional marriage' talk page?Talk:Traditional Marriage to discuss how this happened? Thanks! Sdsds 18:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Typhoon Saomai
Here's a long research paper I came across that could be useful in expanding the Saomai article, in case you wanted to get that featured. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #8
The January issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Gay Niggers of America troll-deletion
Boilerplate:

An editor has asked for a Deletion review of Sadly, No. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. on their talk page.

This article was deleted by a group of Gay Niggers of America trolls as part of a Wikipedia-based 'War on Blogs.' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.250.215.101 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC).

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Angry Nintendo Nerd
I've asked you numerous times to send me the conent of the "Angry Nintendo Nerd" page you deleted. Now, please, send it to me. --Donahue2 03:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I understand I'm not the original author of most of the content, but I thought there was alot of content there that can be reused. If you send me what there was then I'll gladly change the tone and source the material. --Donahue2 03:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, thanks, I really do appreciate this. --Donahue2 04:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Boyz magazine
Why did you speedy-delete the article about the magazine Boyz? If the article needed cleanup, then you could easily have asked any of the users who'd worked on it or flagged it with cleanup. It's not non-notable, it is one of the three main gay freesheets in the UK. Just about any gay male in the UK will have heard of it.

Could you restore the article please. If you really object to it that much, list it on AfD, but drop a note on my Talk: page first please? — OwenBlacker 22:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much; you're a star. I'd been taking a wikibreak for much of 2006, so didn't notice the vandalism. Thanks for restoring it. — OwenBlacker 17:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Turco-Persian Aticle
May I ask why you have removed the deletion notice, few hours after installing it by Wikipedia administrator? You should give sometime so the Wikipedians to contribute and convey their opinions, whether the article should be deleted or otherwise. I have reverted your removal, and please to not remove it until the deadline imposed by Wikipedia policy for deletion Surena 07:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your AfD nominations
I closed both AfDs because the massive amount of canvassing you did on various users' talk pages, combined with the vehement arguments against them (which do not come from a policy or guideline standpoint) led me to believe the nominations were not in good faith. --Core desat  07:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Inviting people to join the discussion, you consider it to be vehement argument - how on the earth people known about it if I don't inform them? This is falsification term by Wikipedia and should be stopped immediately.Surena 07:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The AfD tag is sufficient enough to direct editors to the AfD discussion - posting the same message on 70 editors' user talk pages in an attempt to gather votes for deletion or push a point of view is canvassing, which is a violation of a guideline. Also, editing closed AfD debates (whether you agree with the rationale or not) and replacing removed AfD tags on articles after their AfD debates have been closed as anything other than delete can be seen as vandalism. --Coredesat 07:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What AfD tag? I don't see any tag on the pages in question to inform the Wikipedians about the deletion request and process! It is a mockery that a college boy/girl advising me to be civil! –You are abusing your administrative rights - It seems this your first day of editing - try to be more mature and rational. Surena 07:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
--Extranet (Talk 02:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hippo birdie, two ewes! KillerChihuahua?!? 14:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD's and Their nominator's behaviour
Dear Coredesat,

Yesterday morning you closed two AfD with decision "speedy keep"; Here; Articles_for_deletion/Turko-Persian_Tradition and Articles for deletion/Turco-Persian. Nominator of these AfD's immediately opened "Delete voting" in these articles talk pages. Please check comments of this nominator here;User_talk:Surena, please check these links also comments about wikipedia, wikipedians and administrators,User_talk:Surena. It is hard to assume good faith for this user. I cannot understand why this user take place in this project if he/she thought like so.What is the policy for that kind attractions in wiki? What can I do also. Regards. Must TC 06:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. I am referring to, , , and. --Core desat  06:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which part of my comments considered to be the personal attack as you referring to? Please elaborate. Surena 06:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that I have named you as the individual involved - but obviously I am under scrupulous-eyes here and my comments as well as contributions are being observed, and that is why you have been offended by my observations. However, my apologies, if I have hurt your feelings. Surena 06:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Dear Coredesat -- Thanks for the shortcut – please accept my sincere apologies if I have offended you in any form or manner - as I have wronly thought it was you who initiated the removal of the deletion notice, without any reason -- I should have guessed, KhoiKhoi was involved in this mater. Regards Surena 07:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

just out of curiousity
Ins0mniak82 02:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC) I was just wondering why the Deepthinka page was deleted. When I looked at the deletion log, it says it was deleted due to an un-notable business. I was wondering if what you meant by un-notable business. Ins0mniak82 03:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC) if i understand the rules correctly as linked in my msgs, i have the sources to prove that we are a notable company. there have been number of publications in magazines and newspapers that are non-trivial and not related to our company. the newspaper i'm speaking of is called artvoice and the magazine i'm talking about is cool'eh. if you need to check the source, i can try to search for it online but for the cool'eh magazine, it may be difficult because you need a subscription. but i do have the physical copy.

Cheers
Re: this diff I removed the warning from this users talk page, and left an apology on mine after he brought up the revision. It came up on my watchlist that you blocked someone previously I'd warned, and was looking around when I saw I'd reported to AIV the same editor. I'm absolutely stumped why this IP above was the one posted to AIV when I did the report. Anyhoo, just to let you know it wasn't an intentional screw up, just a bizarre one. Cheers Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 23:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

WebAPP AfD appears to be heading toiletward
The AfD nomination for WebAPP is going south in a very short hurry. The article's author's most recent edits involving the tags and comments about the motivations behind the AfD and the actions of ops in general are becoming extremely heated. Could you please resolve this nomination one way or the other before this becomes a complete trainwreck? Thanks much. Flakeloaf 18:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick. Much appreciated. Flakeloaf 00:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)