User talk:Coredna

Proposed deletion of Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
Hello, Coredna. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Digital Experience Platform (DXP), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 01:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
Hello Coredna,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Digital Experience Platform (DXP) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Coredna", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of your company. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you Trivialist (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Randykitty (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument for inclusion of an article. Independent notability is. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OhNo itsJamie Thanks for the update, Ill get Independent Sources to create the page. Thanks for your patience and have a happy holidays.
 * Please note that having somebody proxy-edit for you is still block evasion and a violation of Wikipedia policy - and does not address the conflict of interest issue. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * user:The Bushranger Thanks for guiding me to the COI page. All I want to do is have a similar page to CrownPeak and many others. We have a 16 year history that I believe is worth including in Wikipedia. How do you suggest this gets onto your platform? Why is this so hard? Coredna (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The first thing is to remember that Wikipedia is not a directory. The fact that another article on a similar product, service, person or object exists does not mean that the one you wish to create an article on is suitable for an article. What is needed is that your product or service is established to be notable through reliable, third-party sources that are independent from you - and the article itself should also be written by someone who is not you, and who is not being contracted, assigned, or otherwise renumerated by you for writing it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * user:The Bushranger Thanks again for your patience and insight. I have spent sometime reading up about getting a page on Wikipedia and have a better understanding. Ill hopefully get a page up when we have more 3rd party coverage and Notable content. In the meantime have a good xmas new year break and thanks again.