User talk:Coren/Archives/2010/February

James Austin
Nice thing you're trying to do keeping the pages autocleaned, but you need to tweak your bot. It's picking up paraphrases and restatements as straight plagiarizating and penalizing/annoying people who take the time to cite their sources. There are only so many ways to describe a date or that someone did one thing before he did something else. Fix your parameters. -LlywelynII (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

South African Theological Seminary
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of South African Theological Seminary, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.satsonline.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

I did not copy the website you say I did! Please look at the links and references...

--Bertus Esterhuysen 09:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Believe Me, if All Those Endearing Young Charms: public domain
Hi, I'm the creator of the article on Believe Me, if All Those Endearing Young Charms. In accordance with your bot's message, I'm letting you know that the text to this song, written in 1808, is in the public domain. Thanks!&#151;The Realms of Gold (talk) 08:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Your bot
Your bot put a possible copyvio tag on the new article Cepola pauciradiata, which http://www.barcodinglife.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=83356 copied, rather than vice versa. I do not think there could ever be a copyvio problem with http://www.boldsystems.org/ but a lot of pages there have a description copied from Wikipedia. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

I got a message from the bot when I split an article. It said that had copvioed from here, a wikipedia mirror for iPhone. You may want to add this site to a list of mirrors. Munci (talk) 19:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Bot request
Forgive me if this has been asked before, but is there any way the bot could mark a page as patrolled after it leaves its comment? For new page patrollers. Thanks! --laurap414 (talk) 01:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I see no technical obstacle, but are you sure that would be wise? The bot only looks for cut and paste from visible website, and would let blatant vandalism through without a peep.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Phoebe Caldwell text
Hi - As the original author and designer of http://www.phoebecaldwell.co.uk I have complied with your copyright requirements by adding the following required statement to the index page of the website:

"The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."

Please pass the page for publication on wikipedia!

Thanks! Blumoon2051 (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. The site now has an adequate free license notice, so I removed the template from the article. Whether the article itself will survive, that's a whole other question. Franamax (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Changchun Station
CorenSearchBot found resemblance between Changchun station and Changchun. There is no resemblance and it is asked that, if that happens, I leave a message on your talk page. Which is what I did. Totozenerd (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Ceylonese State Council election, 1931
CorenSearchBot is showing a copyright problem in the above article even though there isn't one. http://www.thepaleochorasite.com is a mirror site that seems to have copied form the above article within nano-seconds of me creating it.-- obi2canibe talk contr 18:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

41st Century Splendid Man
I believe your bot picked up the album personnel listing which I had copied into the 41st Century Splendid Man article Kgarr (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Ken Johnson art critic
Hello Coren, I just added the entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Johnson_(art_critic)

I had added the reference from the Boston Globe in the text. The information is widely available in other sites online as well, so I'm taking the liberty to remove the copyright information sign.

Sincerely

Verbist (talk) 02:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Verbist (sfredericq@yahoo.com)

International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism
On International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism I removed the what seemed to be the offending language. Simmilarities are unavoidable because both pages deal with the same topic using technical language. Thanks!!-- Bonifacius 08:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes
Hi, Coren. Just a heads up that I've added a pointer to Donating copyrighted materials. I expect this will be uncontroversial, but wanted to point it out in case I'm wrong. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh. Chances are, nowadays, that I would consult with you before making changes to those templates.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL! Glad that the change is okay. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Mischievous Musique, Paulice
hello, i just made an entry for these pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mischievous_musique http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulice

just wanted to tell you theres no copyright violations.

Thanxs, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulice (talk • contribs) 21:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Bot weirdness
--Father Goose (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * How... odd. I'm guessing here that there is a redirect involved that confused the bot.  First time I see that, though.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 11:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

TC 57 copy rights
Thank you for the information. You were so quick to react as I was just editing the content which was copied from iec forum. I am adding more information to it. So I have removed the copy right tag from the same.

Thanks Fahidka(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC).

JC Studios
We are updating listings and Web profiles of JC Studios at its request. The copy from www.needstudios.com is used with JC Studios' permission.Markdfaris (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Your bot is incorrect
The text I used came from an out-of-copyright work used on Wikisource and the specific source was written at the bottom of the text I used.William Maury Morris (talk) 06:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Answered at his talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

JC Studios update
I have removed the tag placed by CorenSearchBot since I am updating listings and Web profiles of JC Studios at its request. The copy from www.needstudios.com is used with JC Studios' permission. I can adjust the profile as needed to comply with Wikipedia guidelines.Markdfaris (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. What we need in order to publish this text is verification of licensing permission from the original website. Please see Requesting copyright permission for more information on how to verify. If you have any questions about the verification process, please let me know at my talk page. The content has been blanked to permit the verification to proceed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

VIT High School
Did not use text from IHSA.org on new page VIT High School. Did use publicly available facts collected on this page, created narrative, and cited IHSA.org. The bot may mistankenly make this attribution on other webpages which are mostly just a list of facts and figures. If I didn't create narrative or cite correctly my apologies on new novice editor ignorance. Powerten (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

false positives of French wiki translations
this Henri Fauconnier is copied from, not that. could you please do something about the speedy look false positives? it is a mirror site non? Pohick2 (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Covista Communications
Hi, My name is Lee Mandon. I work for the sales/marketing department of Covista/Total Tel. I have been granted permission by VP's Anthony Barrett, Kent Terpe, and Joe Mullen to create the Covista page using portions of our other pages and work that I have done myself. The 1phone article in question was given to me with permission and instructions to use for the page as are the other links and images that will be on the page. If you could, I would like the page to be put back up as we at Covista feel that it is crucial in raising the awareness of our company. Thank you for your time, Lee Mandon Sales/Marketing Total Tel/Covista —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leemandon (talk • contribs) 18:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Answered at user talk page. MLauba (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Bernie Weintraub
The text has been completely rewritten. However, the facts are the same. For example, the name of employment can not be changed, who Weintraub sold his business to is the same, etc. Please do not Speedy Delete. Thank you!Pharaway (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Paralinguistic phonetics
This is an elaborated version of my text http://www.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/parafone.htm Talnat (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Remove?
Hi ... your bot tagged the article James Vorenberg as it was being worked on. I believe it is fine now -- shall I remove the tag, or await input? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

YrWall
Hi, all text from the website flagged by the bot has been removed. All material on the page is original text. Please remove the copyright infringement note on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YrWall. Thank you. --Owlpot (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

world of unpredictable wrestling
The page doesnt violate any copyright from wuwlonline.com in fact i received permission from the webmaster to create and edit the page. I paraphrased the descriptions anyway so i dont clash with ur bot anymore, thanks! israeljoffe Israeljoffe (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikimania 2011
Salut Coren,

Je suis de loin la candidature de Montréal et je te félicite pour ton boulot. J'ai des contacts avec Wikimédia France. Que dirais-tu que je demande leur appui officiel? Ça ne pourrait pas nuire, à mon avis. Donne-moi des nouvelles sur ma page de discussion en français. Bonne journée! JF Lepage (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tu es d'accord? C'est OK. Je prends donc contact pour obtenir leur appui. Je te redonne des nouvelles bientôt à ce sujet. JF Lepage (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot down?
Hi, Coren. Your miraculous bot is evidently ailing. :( We need him. Can he be helped? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've given it a swift kick in the diodes. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Finally
The Canadians finally did it, a gold at home.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 02:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I was sort of hoping the record would continue; made me feel oddly patriotic. Steve Smith (talk) 02:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * How Canadian of you, Steve! ;-) Risker (talk) 04:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Exhibit A
I moved the Exhibit A (band) page in order to create a disambig page--no duplicates exist nowRheusavivi (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Tex La Homa page
Hi.

Sorry, I used text provided by Matt Shaw (Tex La Homa) himself. he probably wrote the Talitres website text too.

I hope that now is ok. I removed most of the sentences. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hue GS (talk • contribs) 15:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Gurit
Hi,

I am the website co-ordinator for Gurit, and trying to add a page about the company on Wikipedia. However, I keep on getting messages saying that I am copying references and materials from other sites. In fact all I am doing is copying my own material on the Gurit.com website which has already been copied by other websites. It is they who have infringed copywright, not myself. I have no control over the other sites! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crossinthian (talk • contribs) 16:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Zolas - Copyright Infringement
Hi,

My page keeps being deleted because the band's Bio is on several other websites. We are their record label and we own their bio (we payed for it, and we own the copyright)

Please help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shannonluttmer (talk • contribs) 00:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Add a "public interest" clause to Oversight
A proposal to add a "public interest" clause to Oversight has started at Wikipedia_talk:Oversight.  SilkTork  *YES! 10:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Charles Swift
Sir, please can you help me with the situation of which I am currently embroiled. I tried searching for one of my favourite new actors 'Charles Swift', but could find no page about him, so I decided to write one, with references myself. I did notice that there was a page for the lawyer Charles D. Swift, yet this is under the title page of CHARLES SWIFT, rather than CHARLES D SWIFT. I thought that as the lawyer is known as CHARLES D SWIFT, and the actor is known as CHARLES SWIFT, I could write a new page for the lawyer with a more appropriate title, and give the actor the original page. Thusly, I copied the entire contents of the the lawyer's page and created a new page 'Charles D. Swift'. I hope this has made everything clear, but if you have any further questions, or in fact can help me with the thorny issue of information replacement, I would be much obliged.

Regards,

Senor Rapido —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosrapido (talk • contribs) 10:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * replied at user's talk page. MLauba (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Anita Newcomb McGee
I think I've fixed it to correctly document the public domain sources for my starting of the article. Please let me know if I haven't, and if so, what fully I must do to sort the situation.Huckfinne (talk) 21:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I just want to change the title
I wonder when I saw the title of the article about King Abdulaziz. becouse I am Saudi and there is no one call King Abdulaziz as Ibn Saud so I hope if I can change the title of the article to Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia. Thank You --Jafshy (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Paul Newgarden
I edited the article and believe it is in compliance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palmisano007 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Olympic creed
Call off your bot please Yahoo answers does not own the Olympic creed. Olympic creed was formerly a redir to Olympic oath which has nothing to do with the creed. I copied the text from Wikipedia's Olympic games article to replace the redirect with the text, which is what one expects to find. The goal of the project is to make the internet not suck, and now it sucks a little less. Please prohibit your bot from posting to my page, I have been doing this a lot longer and a lot better than your bot.User:Pedant (talk) 08:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

the text in question is:
The Olympic Creed, distinct from the Olympic Oath reads:

"The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered but to have fought well."

G 1/07
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I have removed the tag. The similarity is due to the quote including a portion of the issued decision (headnote 1). Cheers, --Edcolins (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

No copyright
I did not break a copyright law. For these reasons:


 * Firstly, I just copypasted info from the valuable old version of the article Italian cuisine.
 * Secondly, if you look carefully, since it is a yahoo question desk, the author of the text just copypasted information from wikipedia. I did not copypaste any info from that site.

Please remove the tag.--Theologiae (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note that even copying content from within Wikipedia requires attribution (see WP:Copying within Wikipedia). This was a copy / paste attempt at WP:SPLIT. Comment left at contrib talk. MLauba (talk) 12:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Surrey Opera page
I have edited the article, removed some info, added more unique info.

I assist in editing the website www.surreyopera.org so copyright is sort of mine.

If further changes needed, please let me know and I'll sort - please don't delete the page.

Ta

Cejhoney (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

CSB is down
 The left orium  11:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Didn't look down, but I restarted it just in case. &mdash; Coren (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Someone has copied info from Wikipedia
This website has literally copy and pasted a page from wikipedia and put in on this website. which in turn made a bot flag up a wikipedia page! lol

http://dansteadtraveller.com/?p=459

can you please look into this?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniseg (talk • contribs) 12:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And you in turn copy / pasted an entire article for no apparent reason. Fixed through redirection.
 * If for whatever reason you believe an article should have a different title, you should propose a move on its talk page. Copy / pasting under a new title is a copyright violation, because you lose the contribution history. MLauba (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I've had this bot call me out for copyright infringement when the site http://www.chemie.de/lexikon/e/Disappearing_rainbow_indicator actually copied my article, disappearing rainbow indicator, and even says so in the footer of the article on the site. --Austinian (talk) 22:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: report is 5 months old and has been cleared a long time since. MLauba (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  03:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Bystrianska Cave
No copyright infringement intended. Please, check the article again for current status. Thank you. Krenakarore (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello,

CorenBot reported this article as having copyright issues but we wrote the text on the LinkedIn page so there should be no issue using it here. It is even referenced.

BNP Paribas Financial Services

7h3.jun10r (talk) 22:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

CSD
Hi, thank you for your insights to my questions at CSD. I'll continue the conversation there, but I want to, first, explain something to you here. Prior to starting the RfC, TenOfAllTrades and I had a lengthy discussion about how discussion would be handled at the RfC once it opened. Ten felt very strongly that he wanted to have the discussion above the poll section, and not on the talk page, in order to allow him to present his opinions where users would see them before getting to the poll. He and I agreed to that, with the understanding that all discussion about the merits/pros/cons of the proposal would be there, and not at talk. I've been trying to treat the talk page as being simply about format issues of the poll and similar behind-the-scenes stuff. So, given that our discussion is something I care about, I'm going to move it off the talk page, and into the discussion section of the main page. I just wanted you to understand why I'm doing that. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, no problem, I just thought it was distracting as a thread under Cas's vote, but anywhere is fine really. &mdash; Coren (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Dixon Jones
WIKIPEDIA ENTRY Feb 2010

Dixon Jones is a London based architectural practice established by British architects Jeremy Dixon and Edward Jones. The practice first came to prominence with its winning submission for the Northampton County Offices Competition in 1973. Since then it has won many national and international competitions and awards, most notably Mississauga City Hall (Canada) in 1982, the Royal Opera House, London in 1984, and the Venice Bus Station in 1991. Most recently in 2009 Dixon Jones was selected (with Squire & Partners, and Kim Wilkie,) by Qatari Diar to masterplan the Chelsea Barracks redevelopment. Known for its work on arts and civic projects, university buildings, and commercial projects in sensitive urban sites, the practice has always engaged in the architectural debate between the new and the old. In London over the last two decades the Royal Opera House, National Portrait Gallery, National Gallery and Somerset House illustrate concerns for the existing context and how this might be transformed.

The office is currently working on two education projects: construction has begun on a new classroom and studio building for Kensington and Chelsea College, London; construction is expected to begin in Spring 2010 on the Saïd Business School Phase II, Oxford University. In addition, projects for a new public space for Exhibition Road, London and the redevelopment of Regent Palace Hotel in Piccadilly Circus are both on site.

Recently built Kings Place, London, is a mixed use building housing the Guardian and Observer Newspapers, and a large complex of public amenities including the first new concert hall built in London since the Barbican.

The practice has won many RIBA Regional Awards, Civic Trust Awards, and miscellaneous awards including ‘Best of the Best’ BCO Award for Kings Place Dixon Jones projects are regularly published and exhibited. A monograph on the work of the practice entitled DIXON JONES was published by Right Angle Publishing in 2002. Jeremy Dixon and Edward Jones both lecture and teach widely in the UK and abroad and are external examiners for the RIBA.

External Links www.dixonjones.co.uk www.e-architect.co.uk/architects/dixon_jones.htm www.villajones.com

Further Reading Dixon Jones: Right Angle Publishing, 2002, London  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Margotgj (talk • contribs) 17:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Reg - Vijayalakshmy Subramaniam - WIKI
WIKIPEDIA ENTRY Feb 2010

Hi, the profile given in the WIKI is similar to the one available in carnaticindia.com, since I am the creator of both the proiles and they point to my profile.Hence I sort of own the copyright. Also, I have added footnote / references to the sites where the text is available.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijayalakshmy.subramaniam (talk • contribs) 20:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Brief note
I left a note; I only note here so I know you know. --Asdfg12345 03:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

KYRBGRINDER
The CorenSearchBot has correctly revealed a link between the content shown under Kyrbgrinder and on[ http://www.moodbully.com]. This is because the information is created by Moodbully and is made freely available on both sides. We are part of the management team for Kyrbgrinder and accordingly we are happy for the information sourced from either site to be used. I trust this is ok, however, if there is anything else you require please let me know.

Kind regards For and on behalf of Moodbully Management Bonny Alberts --Moodbully (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Des Foley
I didn't source this article from the webpage http://desmond-foley.epik.com. This was already a wiki page that I redirected from 'Desmond Foley'. That webpage (http://desmond-foley.epik.com) actually referenced the wiki page 'Desmond Foley' at the end. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wishboneash87 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Headline text
Feb 2010

Your bot identified the page for The Irish Rovers in Australia as containing copyrighted material. I was merely listing the contents of the record. This page is similair to pages on other Irish Rovers albums, so if you say it for this page, you would have to say it for the other pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzlightyear (talk • contribs) 19:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)