User talk:CoreyHughes99

Welcome!
Hello, CoreyHughes99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

"Biased and inflamatory"
I can understand why you considered that sentence to be "biased and inflamatory". You would have been absolutely correct to delete it if it were just some editor's (contributor's) opinion. However, the text is reporting a reliable external source and so should stand, which is why I reverted (undid) your deletion. See policy WP:IDONTLIKEIT.

So where can you go from here? Another relevant policy is WP:FALSEBALANCE so if you can show that there is widespread difference of view among notable and neutral commentators, you can argue at the article talk page that it should be removed as not representing an even handed analysis. (Note that "false balance" works both ways. Wikipedia is not bound to give "right of reply" to wp:FRINGE viewpoints).

Please do not be discouraged. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)