User talk:Corey msmith

Your submission at AfC Obscenity trial of Ulysses in The Little Review was accepted
 Obscenity trial of Ulysses in The Little Review, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Great work; photo?
Really nicely done, was this for a school project? Your formatting and footnoting was very thorough, so this was a very easy submission to clean up and publish. Only real criticisms are that your section titles were a bit wordy (short as possible is the goal) and you applied a number of categories which apply to The Little Review itself, not to the trial. But those are extremely minor issues on an otherwise outstanding article, so I hope you'll feel like writing more articles in the future!

One way to add some final zazz to the article: this event occurred prior to 1923, therefore any photos of the trial, or mastheads of news articles about it, are Public Domain. If you can acquire such an image(s), you can upload them to WP:Wikimedia Commons and add them to the article. Just a way to add a bit more historical flavor for readers, whether for "extra credit" if this is a school assignment, or for personal satisfaction if this is just an event of interest to you. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * If nothing else, you could just find an image of the serialization itself online and add that to the article. I notice a few folks have it uploaded online; as I understand it unless they have made significant changes to the image, then they do not exert any ownership on it simply by having posted it online, it remains public domain. Not a lawyer, that's my understanding. But if they did cleanup work to make an old illegible document clearer, or stamped it with a watermark, those we can't just copy, but just a normal scan/photo we can. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)