User talk:Cornbred

Image copyright problem with Image:Cornbred.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Cornbred.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Cornbred 6-07.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Cornbred.jpg. The copy called Image:Cornbred.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The article Cornbred has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Cornbred
A template has been added to the article Cornbred, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. -- Merope 13:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Your Cornbred article
Hello there, I'm assuming that you wrote this article about yourself, which is not recommended Wikipedia policy. I think it's highly likely to be deleted again, in which case you should not repost it: you really need an impartial third party to draft this article about you, using reputable sources which are cited in the text of the article. [[User:Kim Dent-Brown| Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  13:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)