User talk:CorneliaBoldyreff

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, CorneliaBoldyreff! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek . 69  talk 12:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Hi John
It's been an enjoyable afternoon working with you at the BCSWomen Editathon.--CorneliaBoldyreff (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Kay Dudman
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kay Dudman, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/faculties/faculty-of-life-sciences-and-computing/staff/dr-kay-dudman/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Burnett


A tag has been placed on Sarah Burnett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Brainy J ~ ✿  ~ (talk ) 14:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Margaret Ross
To avoid your article being deleted, I have moved the article to your userspace User:CorneliaBoldyreff/ProMargaretRoss where you can continue to improve the article before submitting for review. best wishes ''' Flat Out  let's discuss it  11:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah Burnett


The article Sarah Burnett has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. All sources lead to the subject's company website or personal blog.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. V (t – c)   13:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kay Dudman


The article Kay Dudman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 23:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Jill Dann for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jill Dann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jill Dann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)