User talk:Cornswalled

Regarding edits to The Distorted View Show
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Cornswalled! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule petitiononline\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
I've noticed a pattern in some of your recent edits that suggests you might be trying to make a point about notability and sourcing of Wikipedia content, which I suspect may be connected with the heat generated by the current AfD for Rebecca Watson. While I appreciate that the AfD has caused strong feelings and concern on the part of some editors, disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate any inconsistencies you perceive is possibly the most counter-productive way to make your case. If you have genuine concerns you'd like to raise, there are various discussion pages around the site where you can do this - for example, WT:RS, where the "reliable sources" guidelines can be discussed, or WT:N for the "notability" guidelines (also WT:BIO, which specifically deals with the notability of people). I hope this helps, EyeSerene talk 18:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Temporal Continuity
Just so you know, unless you have any good reason that it should not be done I'm going to move your delete vote on the current AfD for Rebecca Watson down to fit where it was cast, so that they appear in order of when they were added, rather than randomly, I also added a bullet to it so it fits with the format. --Brendan White (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)