User talk:Coronadogirly06

Deletion discussion about Henry Foster III
Hello Coronadogirly06, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Henry Foster III, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Henry Foster III.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I apologize about the delay in response, and I appreciate the feedback (I'm newer here, so I appreciate the opportunity to learn)!
 * I wanted to explain my line of thinking regarding the creation of that page. As someone who reads Wikipedia quite frequently, I noticed that similarly notable members of the San Diego City Council, such as Joe LaCava, Stephen Whitburn, and Marni von Wilpert have pages without notability issues, and reasoned that other members of the San Diego City Council without them should have them as well.
 * I also noticed that in the San Diego City Council Template Box (shown below), Henry Foster (as well as his colleague, Raul Campillo, who I am working on a page for in my sandbox, as well) was previously listed with a red link (meaning no page exists), whereas his colleagues, most of whom have equal or even lesser notability (such as Vivian Moreno, whose page is a stub) to Councilmember Foster.


 * After reading the guide you highlighted, I realize Councilmember Foster likely does not meet the criteria listed, and I understand and respect the decision of more experienced editors if this still does not change the nomination for deletion recently posted on Councilmember Foster's page. Coronadogirly06 (talk) 23:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 San Diego elections (June 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 San Diego elections and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:2024_San_Diego_elections Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Twinkle1990&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:2024_San_Diego_elections reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)