User talk:CorpITGuy/Archive 1

NFRA website?
Do you know anything about the NFRA beyond what is in the article now? I haven't been able to find a website for the nat'l organization - only for several local chapters. Sbowers3 (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * When the website is back up we might add more stuff. Probably not worth the trouble until then. The IP seems insistent on including Martin stuff so I don't think the existence of any other stuff will make a difference. Sbowers3 (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies
I'm actually not sure. You should ask one of the MedCab members. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This user is once again vandalizing the NFRA entry
Earlier today, he posted that it was his first NFRA edit. He has edited the NFRA by means of edit wars at least 30 times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorAccuracy (talk • contribs) 19:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't say that. I said I hadn't edited it recently.  It therefore could not possibly be edit warring.  I did, after posting that, revert vandalism on a page.  The language that had been added was in violation of the Biography of Living Persons Policy [].  Additionally, the exact language added was decided against in the mediation cabal by broad consensus [].   The NFRA article has been locked for editing due to said vandalism. CorpITGuy (talk) 20:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * CorpITGuy, I'd suggest that you forward any queries from this user to me or, with whom I'm opening a dialogue to discuss this. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 20:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will do. CorpITGuy (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * In addition, please try not to get too involved, especially warning the user about WP:AGF. Resut assured I'll keep it under control. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop misrepresenting Wikipedia rules, precedent, and history
Please follow accepted Wikipedia procedure. You have misrepresented the mediation procedure. Mediation is certainly not binding, and furthermore the outcome you pointed to was not agreed upon. You have failed to engage on the talk page and discuss the edits, as is standard Wikipedia procedure. You have misunderstood NPOV and ignored standard Wikipedia practice, which is to include a one-sentence bio of an organization's leader. The political and professional career of a president of an organization is typically included in a Wikipedia article, despite your past misrepresentations to the contrary. If you don't like my suggested bio, supply one of your own, but please stop the mindless reverting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.254.47 (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * (1) Actually, I did discuss on the talk page. You're the one who didn't reply. (2) Please sign your posts.  It's really annoying. (3) You're the ONLY person who doesn't understand how arbitration ended. CorpITGuy (talk) 11:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Stop lying. You have lied about the discussion on the talk page, which you failed to participate in after my edit there. You have lied about my "unsigned" posts, which Wikipedia automatically signs. You have lied about arbitration, which is a nonbinding procedure and only ends after agreements between parties. This, of course, is hardly an exhaustive list of matters you have lied about. You have lied about the standard conventions of Wikipedia, which permits and encourages brief bios of organizational leaders in the organization's entry. You have lied about me being a vandal in an effort to hide the fact that there is a content dispute, even to the extent of lying about the changes I made that you incorporated when you claim to be reverting. You have lied about Rod Martin's notability vote fraud on Wikipedia and the sockpuppets he used that were subsequently banned from Wikipedia. In short, your frequent lies make it difficult or impossible to deal with you as a responsible Wikipedia contributor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.254.47 (talk) 13:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * You forgot to sign your comment... again. CorpITGuy (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Once again, you misrepresent Wikipedia procedures. SineBot automatically signs comments. But as we have seen, misrepresentation is your habit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.254.47 (talk) 19:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but it's still expected that you sign your own comments instead of letting SineBot do the work. That's why it reminds you after signing a few of your comments for you. Tim Song (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Re Aping of western culture by the younger generation
Regarding this article: first, it's not patent nonsense (thus not CSD-able) if you can actually read it and get a sense of what it was talking about. WP:NONSENSE has additional some illustrations. Second, everyone (that includes IPs or the creator) can remove a prod (see WP:PROD). I've taken the article to WP:AfD. Tim Song (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If you think it isn't patent nonsense, you have better reading skills than I do. I read the whole thing twice and it almost made my eyes bleed.  Anyway, it's all yours.  Unwatching it now.  CorpITGuy (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)