User talk:CorporateM/EthicalWiki/Archive 1

Looking good!
The PRNews supports notability. Pls add an edit request template if you need help moving this to main space at some point. Cheers! Woz2 (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * User: Steven Walling reviewed the article in AfC and rejected it. You can see his comments here. However you're welcome to discuss it with Steven or be bold. I didn't think his portrayal was entirely fair, but it is at least a borderline case of notability and I prefer not to argue. User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 12:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * OK I Think the PRNews citation puts it into notable territory. I'll move it and see if there are objections. Cheers! Woz2 (talk) 12:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK Nomination
Template:Did_you_know_nominations/EthicalWiki

Edit request
One comment on "and offer content of value to the site by hiring EthicalWiki editors instead"

I guess this isn't entirely untrue in that any business advocates that people use their service, but the point is that I advise against directly editing articles and in favor of merely offering great content to editors. Some Wikipedians have suggested that I edit articles directly, but I continue to stand steadfast behind the Bright Line policy at least as a rule of thumb for most cases.

How about: "by offering content of value to the site's editors, a service sold by EthicalWiki." User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 07:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The sentence was a bit long for my taste so I put something in that spirit there. Do you think it captures the concept? Woz2 (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Woz. Works for me. User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 12:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Concerns
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know. SmartSE (talk) 13:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above mentioned discussion is now closed, and further comments should be added to WP:Articles for deletion/EthicalWiki instead. Cheers! Woz2 (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)