User talk:Corporate cat

February 2014
Hello, I'm E Wing. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jahangir Siddiqui without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! E Wing (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi, Corporate cat. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Ruby  Murray  09:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Jahangir Siddiqui‎
You've repeatedly removed referenced content from Jahangir Siddiqui‎, sometimes writing in the edit summary that something has been proven false. Please note that it already clearly says in the article that the land grabbing allegations were proven false. Regarding the section on his sister, I can find no reliable sources for the claim that he has disowned her. If you can find them, please add them to the article. Ruby  Murray  09:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest caution
Hello, Corporate cat. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright policies
Hello Corporate cat, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

The article AKD Capital has been deleted as every section was copied from its sources. While it is imperative that content on Wikipedia present information that is verifiable by sources, as explained above, that information must in almost every case be written in your own words and structure.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Other articles you created in the last two days also contained copied content. Much of this has been removed, although some of it has been rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AKD Investment


A tag has been placed on AKD Investment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (AKD Capital) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating AKD Capital, Corporate cat!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The page is reviewed."

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Copyright problem: AKD Trade
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as AKD Trade, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.scribd.com/doc/62935341/Efficiency-of-Stock-Markets-in-Pakistan and possibly other sources, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:AKD Trade and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, AKD Trade, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:AKD Trade with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:AKD Trade. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:AKD Trade saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

ANI discussion
Hello, Corporate cat. As I noted above, you are still copy-pasting content into articles. This is a serious issue, but I'm more concerned that you and User:Creative factor seem to be working together to advance an agenda for JS Group that contravenes our conflict of interest guidelines. Accordingly, I've opened a section at the administrators noticeboard to discuss my concerns and the best way forward. You can find and participate in the discussion here. If your account is autoblocked (that is, it will not let you edit other pages), you should be able to leave any notes here on your talk page that could be carried over to that discussion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC) And I am noting that you are biased. You delete every content in favor of JS Group and put content in article against it. when it comes to allegation that do not address JS group (as JS Group is not involved in stock trading, its subsidiary are doing this), you clearly ignore this. The allegations were against 23 companies and no judicial proceedings reported til date. but because it was published in a Sri Lankan paper who is interested in Pakistan's JS Group and no local paper named JS group, you are not moving / removing it. I dont know what else to say humbly that this all political and fabricated news need to be removed.


 * To be perfectly frank here, I do not care about JS Group or its rivals beyond my insistence that you and your fellow employees comply with our policies. I am far from your country and completely uninvolved with your economic politics. All we care about here is that our articles summarize in due weight what reliable sources say about notable subjects.


 * If it is necessary, we will block all of the accounts involved in this obvious attempt to bias articles. Articles can be protected as necessary so that new accounts cannot edit them. The only way to reliably influence article content, including defending what you believe belongs, is to follow Wikipedia's rules for doing so.


 * In short, you must collaborate with other editors on Wikipedia and must follow dispute resolution processes. You cannot bring multiple accounts to work together to try to influence the articles - this is forbidden by policy. You cannot copy content from other websites, including pictures, except as permitted by copyright policy and non-free content policy and guideline. You cannot spread negative material about your company's rivals while removing negative material about your own. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Aqeel karim dhedhi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aqeel karim dhedhi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 09:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AKD Investment.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AKD Investment.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:AKD securities.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AKD securities.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 09:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Sock puppetry
On noting that you have reuploaded File:Aqeel karim dhedhi.jpg, a file previously uploaded by blocked User:Creative factor under the name File:Aqeel Karim Dhedhi.jpg with the exact same summary ("the news") and that you have also uploaded several other pictures Creative factor had uploaded which have been deleted, it seems quite clear that you are in violation of our policy on sock puppetry.

Accordingly your account has now been blocked. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of AKD Investment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AKD Investment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AKD Investment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 02:11, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AKD Investment.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:AKD Investment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of AKD Securities for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AKD Securities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AKD Securities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 11:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AKD securities.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AKD securities.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of AKD Capital for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AKD Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AKD Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  22:45, 9 August 2019 (UTC)