User talk:Corpuskrusty

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Stop now
Hi there, I see you're adding inappropriate external links per WP:ELNO to articles and then accusing those reverting your edits of being "shills" for the pharmaceutical industry. This is disruptive and uncivil. Please stop now, or you may be blocked. 02:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

The links were valid and appropriate. The removal did not adhere to the guidelines. Your comments were not warranted. Kindly review the guidelines before you falsely accuse. --Corpuskrusty (talk) 03:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Corpuskrusty

December 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 03:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You are blocked for a variety of disruptive behaviors. In no particular order: 1. throwing around accusations of vandalism and disruption, of edits not meeting various Wikipedia criteria, is more than a bit silly given that your edits fall foul of a number of policies, with this edit as the most blatant example; 2. edit warring--which is edit warring even if you're right; 3. all these accusations of editors being "shills" for the pharmaceutical industry. I could find more, perhaps. Point is, I can't tell if you're being a troll or if you're a good-faith editor who's being hard-headed and hard of hearing, but it really does not matter: we have no time to deal with this disruption and until you change that tune it is unlikely that an administrator will grant an unblock request. Drmies (talk) 04:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I read the article you linked to
Here is an example of lying by USERS Formerly 98 and Zad68. I did NOT add anti-psychiatry or anti-pharma advocacy links. One was a website that lists SSRIs in the media and the news. The other a support group for Benzo users. They lied to get me blocked.

"This new WP:SPA user has registered today for the first time, and begun methodically adding an anti-psychiatry link to multiple psychopharmacology articles, including Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, benzodiazepine, and Antidepressant discontinuation syndrome. His addition to benzodiazepine was immediately reverted by a Medicine project administrator @Jfdwolff:, and the edit to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor by myself. He immediately responded to my reversion by attempting to edit war the link into place, left a nasty note on my userpage calling me a shill, and raised this ANI complaint against me without leaving notification on my user page. I respectfully submit that this user is not here to build an encyclopedia, and request that at a minimum, he be sternly warned against edit warring and attempting to use Wikipedia to WP:SOAPBOX. I have been here for a full year, and have never been blocked or warned in many thousands of edits. Formerly 98 (talk) 02:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC) In their one day as an editor, or at least one day registered with this name, OP has 16 edits, most of then fiddling around with external links to anti-pharma advocacy sites that fail WP:ELNO, then a revert citing WP:FRINGE, an edit-warring warning laced with an accusation of acting as a "shill for the pharmaceutical industry", blanking well-sourced content, restoring duplicate content, blanking MORE content, and then right to ANI complaining the OTHER editor is blanking. OP is clearly a sock/"returning editor" with an axe to grind if not an outright troll. Zad68 02:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)"

I am neither a "sock" nor a "troll" as they wrote. I have no "axe to grind". He also lied that I did not leave him a message before the ANI complaint. I did. I am just a new user who wanted to help out on Wikipedia! --Corpuskrusty (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)corpuskrusty Corpuskrusty (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The "diversity" that NPR was talking about has to do with editor demographics. It has nothing to do with adding psuedoscience/anti-science stances and adding links to sites that clearly don't meet reliable sources guidelines. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Unblock
You can see from my contributions history I never added any "pseudoscience/anti-science stances" or added any "links to sites that do not meet reliable sources guidelines" per the link you posted. You are confusing me with another Wikipedia user. If you check my contributions you will see you are making a mistake. It's all there for you to see if only you would check, instead of regurgitating the other users comments. You will see that in fact they are the ones violating the rules, not me. Maybe you already know this and are just perpetuating this ruse with self-serving comments? I hope not, but it wouldn't surprise me since this has been the case from the beginning. --Corpuskrusty (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)corpuskrustyCorpuskrusty (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Please only open one unblock request at a time. And no, I haven't mistaken you for another user; you've been told more or less the same thing by a number of users. If you don't understand how advocacy links don't meet reliable sources, Wikipedia is probably not the project for you. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 22:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)