User talk:Corradopark3

Message
I have left a message for you on my talk page. If you wish to swap photos please leave the current one up until it is replaced. It is best to upload via loading it to Wikicommons first. Thank you. Span (talk) 22:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * It would be good to mention who took the photo on the |Wikicommons file that you filled in (with the license) but the guidelines we don't mention the photographer on the article. A date and place would be great, though - on the file and under the photo in the article. More detail about her with a solid reference would be good too. Best wishes Span (talk) 00:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, as I mentioned, you would have to have to cite an article or something in order not to have the relationship details reverted. A lot of random editors add made up nonsense every day. There is no point in getting into an edit war over it. If you need help in adding a [WP:RS|reliable source]] or have other questions, please ask me. Wikipedia does have guidelines and we attempt to write articles in line with these, although there is clearly a long way to go to make many of them the best that they can be. Thanks Span (talk) 17:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

What's your email address BTW? I want to discuss this matter on there rather than here. Corradopark3 (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Sure, my email is enabled. If you look at the column on the far left of my user page, there should be a link there. Just to say, I don't know anything about Grey Delisle at all, and have little idea how OTRS works. Fred might have access to more info. I think it's to Delisle's advantage to have less rather than more said about her. Wikipedia aims to protect the subject's privacy. It is no bad thing, IMHO to not go into the details of current relationships. Best wishes Span (talk) 18:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Grey DeLisle
Please do not add non-public personal information to. The information must be suppressed due to its personal nature. User:Fred Bauder Talk 17:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Grey delisle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Grey delisle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Grey delisle.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Images and other media must only be uploaded if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)