User talk:CorrectToTruth999

August2022
Please don't edit Wikipedia to try to make it line up with your personal opinions. JBW (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok I just saw this message. I don’t understand why. The “facts” that they published is false. He is not best know for fraudulent 5gbioshield. Someone paid for an article to be published which they sent all over the news articles. There was NEVER anyone investigated and there are NO police papers of being investigated for fraud. I spoke to Sacha personally just yesterday after watching this unfold for over the years and I knew him before this started. It’s madness to post fraud on someone on your page which is FALSE when NO police records, no fraud slant investigation ever took place, except for one article which was published everywhere paid for and sent all over the news outlets. But there was no fraud. Other then thousands of testimonials from happy buyers. Which loved their little usb device… and believe it or not wrote many testimonials. I know because a few years back I had all the testimonials sent to me personally from all the buyers to organize in case there was going to be an investigation and there wasn’t. But I read all the testimonials.

So what you are publishing on Wikipedia is a lie. And it’s really rude too. CorrectToTruth999 (talk) 22:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Sacha Stone, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 20:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sacha Stone. --   LuK3      (Talk)   22:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok I just saw this message. I don’t understand why. The “facts” that they published is false. He is not best know for fraudulent 5gbioshield. Someone paid for an article to be published which they sent all over the news articles. There was NEVER anyone investigated and there are NO police papers of being investigated for fraud. I spoke to Sacha personally just yesterday after watching this unfold for over the years and I knew him before this started. It’s madness to post fraud on someone on your page which is FALSE when NO police records, no fraud slant investigation ever took place, except for one article which was published everywhere paid for and sent all over the news outlets. But there was no fraud. Other then thousands of testimonials from happy buyers. Which loved their little usb device… and believe it or not wrote many testimonials. I know because a few years back I had all the testimonials sent to me personally from all the buyers to organize in case there was going to be an investigation and there wasn’t. But I read all the testimonials.

So what you are publishing on Wikipedia is a lie. And it’s really rude too. CorrectToTruth999 (talk) 22:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:OR for starters. We publish what reputable sources publish, nothing more, nothing less.  We don't allow Original Research, ie: input from people "because I know him" kind of stuff.  This is no different than any other encyclopedia.  If you have newspaper or other reputable sources that back up your claims, then you can use them to counter the information in the article.  I suggest using the article talk page, as you aren't familiar with how we do this at Wikipedia.  You have to understand, anyone can come here and say "I know this isn't true, so I'm deleting it", including when it is 100% true.  Obviously we can't allow changes based on one person's personal opinion.  This isn't a blog, it is an encyclopedia.  Those other things I linked are also important to understand. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 23:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Another important point is that Wikipedia seeks to cover a subject from a neutral point of view, as recorded in third party sources, unconnected to any person or organisation that is the subject of an article. Consequently, since you know the person in question, you should not be editing the article. Obviously if there are factual inaccuracies in an article then you should try to have them corrected, but you should do so not by editing the article yourself, but by explaining what changes you think need to be made, and requesting that an independent editor make those changes. You also need to provide reasons why the material in question is not accurate, based on reliable independent sources. Obviously we can't accept statements as facts just because someone who has chosen to create a Wikipedia account says so, because anyone can create an account and make any claims they like. You can read a more detailed explanation of this issue in Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest. JBW (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)