User talk:Correcterminator

October 2015
Hello, Correcterminator, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

↓This is Correctorminator ,i m responding to your query ,which u send at my email. address.well first of all i m not trying to operate multiple accounts ,my earlier account sdpdev had problems in logging so i get this new one and i will be operating form this one. and one more thing ,I am learned authentic scholar of vedant and hindu scriptures ,In the article Sharabha i,ve found many biased false communal misinformation ,the porevious author lied about sharabhopnishad and presented it in a manner that suggest dispute withing hindu community and this is not the case ,none of main hindu or vaisnavites dispute or contest sharabh avtar .previous author quotes some works of biased lesser known communal elements who always want to create a rift in this relegion. the matter is not so easy .it can bring unrest among community as now many a readers form india are reading it and i also suggest my students to read it from wikepedia and for most references i come and suggest wikepedia and i m thankful for organization. So the changes i, ve made just now are correcting those biased instigative remarks about great lords be it vishnu or shiva ,as a hindu we respect all our five gods as per panchaytan. Though i have given refernce and links for validity of my infiormation.still if some more ciations are needed polease do inform me .i would like yton adhere to wikepedias policy for sure. But i guess u also wont encourage utterly false information. and yes one more thing i m not able to find where to reply your email or explain about my reasons,; i have got messages but i dont know how to reply to them .if u can help it will be great if u have any queries suggestion u are most welcome.

but seriously protraying hindu community as fighting within when it is false and balatantly providing false information ,i think wikepedia must encourage to edit such false ,instiagting contents.

Thank you ↓     ↓     ↓      ↓     ↓      ↓

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Abecedare/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Abecedare/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Abecedare/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk /cntrb 13:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sharabha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2015
54}} report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.

Recent edit to Sharabha
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Sharabha without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  11:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 14:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Please also see our edit warring policy. --Neil N  talk to me 14:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Adding this to make it really clear that edit warring will not be tolerated after your block expires. Neil N  talk to me 15:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)