User talk:Corrosiv-O

Article Corrosiv-O
A tag has been placed on Corrosiv-O, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ~Matticus TC 09:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --DeLarge 11:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Corrosiv-O
A tag has been placed on Corrosiv-O, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rcnet 11:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Rcnet 11:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not delete speedy delete tags, use -hold- instead.
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rcnet 12:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Corrosiv-O, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Matticus TC 12:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on December 11 2006 to Corrosiv-O
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 3 hours.

Please don't create articles about yourself; and be aware of WP:3RR.

William M. Connolley 12:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Block extended
I have extended your block for creating the sockpuppet Corrosiv-o Liam in an attempt to evade your block. If you attempt this again, or recreate the article Corrosiv-O, the block wil be extended to indefinite and the article locked from recreation. Glen  12:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Block now indefinite
Per the above, once again you created a sockpuppet and recreated the deleted article. The article is now protected from recreation, and you have been blocked indefinitely. Glen  13:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Substing
Warning messages on this page have been subst'd using the AutoWikiBrowser. Note:This is not a new warning, but only some minor maintenance, following Wikipedias policy of subst'ing warning templates. Thank you.- Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)