User talk:CorvetteZ51

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 01:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Electrical noise encryption
A "" template has been added to the article Electrical noise encryption, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. greenrd 00:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Al Gore's Seven Point Pledge with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Al Gore's Seven Point Pledge with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Al Gore's Seven Point Pledge saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rackabello 06:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Response to your note on the article's talk page
''Unless the text has been placed under a GDFL license, has been released into the public domain, or has been specifically authorized to be reprinted on Wikipedia by the author, (and the author has emailed the Wikimedia foundation to communicate this point) its considered a Copyvio and cannot be placed on this website. The article also currently reads like an advertisement, lacks context, and an assertion of notability, and these are also criteria for deletion. Rackabello 06:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)''

reposted from Kyoto protocol Talk page

the EU ETS is completely separate from Kyoto
Please post any evidence to the contrary. CorvetteZ51 (talk) 00:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Like any stock market, there are two parts to the trading mechanism - the market process, and the settlement process. The spot, futures & options markets systems operate independent of the ETS & Kyoto settlement systems, other than their contracts, which are compatible. But post-trade, the "settlement" systems are run by government bodies and are what enforce the Kyoto-ness on everything. Most market players dont need to be aware of this unless there is a problem somewhere.
 * Phase II of the EU ETS will operate entirely under the Kyoto umbrella and coincides with the 5 year Kyoto Compliance period. Like Kyoto systems, everything in the ETS is automated once a trade hits the registry. So for compatibility with Phase II, the Member States & EC registries 'borrowed' the Data Exchange Standard (DES) agreed under the Marrakech Accords and implemented it for Phase I. However, the EC have added their own extra processes such as requiring a "surrender" of allowances to the commission for checking before the Kyoto retirement phase. (The DES can be searched for & downloaded from the UNFCCC.int site. You will note that it contains a concept called a "supplementary transaction log" - this is to allow the EC systems to function under the umbrella of the UNFCCC, which requires direct access to each party in order to check & validate transactions for compliance under the parties' Kyoto obligations.) The UNFCCC systems validate EU allowances etc before they get passed to the EC systems for checking. Of course, this linkage has to be the case for CERs, ERUs, etc. to be fungible with EUAs, otherwise you will be comparing apples with oranges.
 * For Phase I the process is similar, although the ETS EUAs only cover 1 ype of GHG (as defined per Kyoto), and the NAP is set wholly within Europe without consulting third parties. Of course, the UN doesn't validate EUA trades during Phase I. However the Kyoto-compatibility issue still stands as the operators in Phase I need to access CERs during this period, and the CDM executive has been busy approving lots of CDM projects for the last year or two for them. For a concrete proof of how interlinked they are, the EC recently announced it has problems linking into the UN before the March 2008 CDM deadline for 2007 delivery. The market got the jitters and EUA prices jumped about 10% in an hour
 * Its probable that the EU will be introducing additional types of unit that go beyond Kyoto in the future - though the mechanism of handling, say, aviation allowances, has not been agreed yet. Ephebi (talk) 01:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

April 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2010_Polish_Air_Force_Tu-154_crash. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Edits may not have been meant as vandalism, but they significantly changed the sense of the sentences in which they were made. Please discuss any changes you wish to make to such a heavily edited article as this on the Talk Page'' Haruth (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Firearms cartridge infobox
Hi - I understand a chamber, cartridge case or projectile has no twist rate. The Wikipedia infobox does however contain a twist rate entry field because this information is relevant. Because of this the C.I.P. datasheets always contain the common twist rate used for the many chamberings contained in the C.I.P. database as well as dimensional information regarding land and field diameters etc. because they are needed or desirable to produce/design/cut chambers, barrels, cartridges (cases) and projectiles. You are focusing solely on the cartridge case and not on the entire cartridge which contains a projectile that needs an appropriate amount of spin to function correctly. Of course common projectiles for the chambering must be assumed as exceptionally long projectiles need "custom" shorter twist rates to function adequately down range.--Francis Flinch (talk) 10:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Derivatives
I have reverted all your edits on the Derivative (finance) article for these reasons: If you want to make wholesale changes to an article, particularly contentious changes, it is best to explain your edits in the edit summary, and explain in detail what you did or intend to do on the article talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You did not explain any of your edits, particularly some massive removal of content. Unexplained removal of content is considered vandalism by many editors.
 * Several of your changes created incorrect meanings (examples: Futures and options are the most notable derivatives, but you changed it to "swaps". Derivatives are priced based on expected future movements, but you changed it to movements. Both are incorrect.)


 * Amatulic... futures are not derivatives. One third of the article is misleading, apparently with the intention of making derivatives appear to be more legitimate than they are. Please Advise.CorvetteZ51 (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * We must comply with the official policies Reliable sources and Verifiability for anything we write in articles. Reliable sources disagree with you (here's one example). Futures and options are derivatives. You basically imposed your own personal opinions on the article.


 * The "legitimacy" of derivatives is not the subject of Derivative (finance); however, if you want to write about that topic, I suggest you either (a) discuss it on the talk page first, and/or (b) create a new subsection in the article about legitimacy -- but if what you write isn't backed up by sources, it will likely get reverted.


 * If you have a problem with the neutrality of the article, please bring up the issue on the talk page, explaining where you see a problem, and why it's a problem. Articles must comply with Neutral point of view also, so any bias should always be pointed out. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

2010 FIFA World Cup
Hello, please do not insert opinions into the article but on its talk page where you can also discuss a better wording if you see the need.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

2011 UEFA Women's Champions League Final
Why did you undo my edit to this article? Was Camille Abily not the player of the match? – PeeJay 07:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your recent edits to David Mills (footballer), Manchester United F.C. in Europe and 2011 UEFA Women's Champions League Final do not seem to have been constructive, and, viewing the relevant editing history, look very much like malicious stalking of the edits of another editor. To avoid unjustified suspicions, if you think you have good reasons for edits you make then please explain them in edit summaries.}} JamesBWatson (talk) 11:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

James
I have no animosity towards you. why towards me?

````

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Targeted killing, you may be blocked from editing. Epeefleche (talk) 18:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Miguel Díaz-Canel are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. GnarlyLikeWhoa (talk) 17:21, 23 April 2018 (UTC)