User talk:Corvus cornix/Archive 9

James Eatock
If you look closely, none of the sub-articles have links within them, however they are realiable links at the bottom of his page, including one for the He-Man and She-Ra blog. I seperated the infomation from the 'Time Life' portion as it has nothing to do with Time Life and is seperate from James' work on The Real Ghostbusters; Region 1 DVD releases. If you wish, you can include links to the links on the page if you wish, but please understand that others (not just me) have done the same thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David31584 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Redirects_for_discussion
I have nominated this redirect for deletion. Corvus cornix talk  04:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Manuela Testolini was the wife of Prince. She is mentioned in the article. And it is sourced. I think there has been some misunderstanding, and you have got her confused with someone else.  SilkTork  *YES! 09:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

How exactly did I defame Mr. Jenkins? I simply removed excess information in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.65.3 (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Richard Holbrooke
To avoid edit warring on Richard Holbrooke, I'd suggest that you leave further reverts the content referring to the Obama administration to others. (I was just reverting this myself, but you were a bit faster.) Cs32en   Talk to me  01:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:User:It4pune/Perennial Systems
Can you help me identify which areas of the article shows that I am advertising this company. It is just one of the series of articles on upcoming companies in Pune. — Preceding unsigned comment added by It4pune (talk • contribs) 09:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Double Standard application by user Corvus cornix
This user, posted on the front page discussion that I was violating personal attack rules. This is right. But what was also right, he was exercising double standards. This is because I was defending myself against someone that explicitly, clearly and unequivocally said that I blame ALL wikipedians to be Fascists. He never said that to him. He let him attacking me. --Leladax (talk) 07:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I should add, that this was also done by someone else below him. Someone else try to find "evidence" that I blame ALL wikipedians to be fascist. He never said anything to him either. I suppose, to be allowed here to do personal attacks, act like a gang and destroy discussion with bullying, you have to be "polite" about it. Just how the British Empire would slaughter people in African Colonies. "But we are polite at least!". Hypocrites. --Leladax (talk) 07:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

RE: December 2010
Why did you revert my edit? There were also the sources that claim that "My Country" sold 500 million copies. Also from Jackie Chan's blog. SJ (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

I know, but you would count that only China has got nearly 1,5 billion people in its country. SJ (talk) 01:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, so, Jackie Chan's official blog can't be recognised as reliable source. SJ (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Why tou have nominated this artice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somesh for deletion while these type oof artices exist in wikipedia like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohit. ss 06:47, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs)

this name is one of the important name of Lord Vishnu. so this article should not be deleted. ss 06:53, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs)

YES ! ss 06:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs) http://www.hindunames.net/boy-names-any-page-21.htm http://www.salagram.net/names1000v.html#trans http://www.indianhindunames.com/indian-hindu-boy-name-s.htm and others i have mentioned in the references of article ss 06:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs)

i don't know much about wikipedia. but you can do. ss 07:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someshvrm (talk • contribs)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion: nitin gupta
I understand the coi rules but the following warrants a second though: I think it finds place given the position as an inventor with 5 patents at this age and being the only student to represent two different countries in ACM ICPC, apart from the being one of the youngest microsoft research fellows. You cannot always blindly apply rules; I do not present any bias or present myself as god. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xnitingupta (talk • contribs) 00:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

icarly season 4
Since the twitter an facebook references are from Dan and one of the cast members they are then considered a RS. Look at the main episode talk page. this was brought up awhile back.99.19.14.106 (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

it is being used as a secondary source. other editors said it was fine as long if it was from Dan and/or the cast. We have been using those references since they started using twitter and Dan started using facebook.99.19.14.106 (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

The episode page decission from Augest I've noticed that under the "References" section there are multiple "Facebook" and "Twitter" references, along with a few blog references. These are generally frowned upon using, as they aren't reliable sources. Unless anyone has any reason on why they should be kept, I will remove them. Battleaxe9872 Talk 13:59, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

'They are reliable if they are from the series creator or cast.'Bold text Ωphois 14:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Iskra Research page / Information that may be deleted
I wrote on the discussion board: Intended addendum to Vadim Rogovin and Nadezhda Joffe pages. Latter page mentions this organization but leads to dead link, former page should probably mention this organization, as it is the sole publisher in the author's native language, nevertheless, fact was removed on Rogovin's page. Recommend merge with another page in event new page seems excessive (i.e, in some capacity to the Rogovin page, which already cites books from this organization).

As you can see I would like to add information about Rogovin's publisher (who is used already as a source for his own page). But when I began this it was marked as Spam by yourself.

thank you, Yearbuilt1940 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yearbuilt1940 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

99.19.14.106 (talk) 19:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

You're right...
Good catch. I missed that award nomination. I'll fix it right away. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Exscientologykids.com
Hey there! Thanks for leaving me a note on my talk page about the speedy deletion of exscientologykids.com. May I suggest that you perhaps take this to AfD instead? It's just that the website was created by three people who are currently seen as notable in their own rights (AfD pending of course) and has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources. To me that asserts significance if not notability. Let me know if you disagree! Always happy to be corrected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I have to agree its invalid CSD and i have contested it. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I have also left a note opposing speedy deletion. I have no idea whether it is notable enough for inclusion, but multiple reliable sources indicate significance, which is what the CSD criteria is about, not notability. --  Phantom Steve .alt/ talk \[alternative account of Phantomsteve] 02:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Southern Cherokee Nation of kentucky
Hey man, you undid a lot of work done by 76.121.154.140, literally when he was in the middle of a total rewrite. Your reason was that he wasn't sourcing it as he went. I'm on your side about sourcing but give the guy a chance. I happen to know from my own research on the article that what he is writing is accurate and entirely in keeping with the many external links I myself supplied so can you please let him get on with it - What he's doing is very authoritative. Perhaps if you had seen the original article you would more appreciate his stuff. Mark Dask 08:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Milly y Molly
Milly y Molly is the TV series based on the books by a New Zealand author; but the TV series is produced in Singapore. The TV series, as broadcast in the Caribbean, carries Spanish language episode titles with English audio. I got many translations of the Spanish-titled episodes from other sites online. The first few paragraphs of the article, up to the 1st footnote, represent a direct quote from the referenced site, that is why I put the reference address. The article, Milly y Molly (TV), was meant to be a direct link from the Milly Molly (books) article, not replace it. I was in the midst of tidying up the link description between "Milly Molly" and "Milly y Molly" when I noted that "Milly y Molly" disappeared and I saw your query. Will you please restore my Milly y Molly article. Wikifood (talk) 14:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Euthanasia and slippery slope
Surely u already read that I voted for keep the article, But as I also warned, I am concerned with the editions made by TickleMeister, which u also found POV. Meanwhile instead of replacing those POV sentences, and instead of trying to balance the articule, TickleMeister just inserted more of that sort of paragraphs pro euthanasia, making even more unbalanced the article. Therefore I am concerned the article will be deleted because of his attitude. Can u help us?? -- ClaudioSantos (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

re Newsom
Thanks for the link, I'll bring it up on Talk:List of Governors of California. Please join us there. :) --Golbez (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Anka Wolbert
Hi Corvus,

Thanks for your comment. As suggested, I have referenced Anka Wolbert but the page is now down. Can you explain why? Please note I did not start Anka Wolbert. Last night, the Clan Of Xymox article was heavily edited (not by me!) and a paragraph referring to Pieter Nooten's solo career and Anka Wolbert's solo career was taken out. Two new pages were then created for Pieter Nooten and Anka Wolbert. I received messages on my Userpage saying Anka Wolbert needed more reliable references which I provided. Anka Wolbert (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey Corvus, if you could provide a bit more detail (on her talk page) about what the article did and did not have, I would appreciate it. I could do that too, but I don't want to speak for you. Spare her a few minutes for an explanation. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Exelsa
Hi, I removed the "merge" tag on the Exelsa character, because she does not have to be merged into the sitcom article. On this following video (which is the season 2 opening of La familia P. Luche) actress Bárbara Torres has a significant billing and her character is shown with the rest.

Thank you!

Opening La familia P. Luche (Second season) User:OsotedeMonte--V. Villalvaso 01:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Thebooze
Re your post at WP:ANI, although it has been closed as stating that Themfromspace will contact Thebooze, as you raised the issue at ANI, I think you should gently point Thebooze towards the relevant policies and guidelines. Administrative action is not needed at the moment because the editor in question has not been shown that they may be doing something wrong, and thus cannot be said to have continued to do wrong having been told that they were doing wrong. I've not looked at their contributions and thus am not in a position to make a judgement, but will say that opening a discussion with the editor is a first port of call. Refusal to discuss issues raised is something that can be acted upon. Mjroots (talk) 10:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

blue ribbon schools
Just a heads up, I'm undoing your redirects of two Tustin-based schools. My understanding is that schools being listed as Blue Ribbon schools are considered notable. I'm no fan of letting them be magnets for POV and other COI, but as the highest award a school in the US can earn, it's significant. tedder (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Palin
I happened on what you said about the Palin articles at a noticeboard - I saw no 'repeated tirades' - if you seriously care about NPOV you should look critically at edits. I don't know what your politics are - I have an idea obviously - but if you care about NPOV, you should not say an editor  who is responding to a request  is launching 'endless tirades', and generally trying to intimidate others with exaggerated claims. 'Repeated tirades..' indeed. Codswallop, sir, codswallop. Sayerslle (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

RfC/U
In theory, at least, an RfC/U is supposed to be a forum where editors can air legitimate grievances and seek to resolve them with the editor in question and the community. They're not binding, so even if the desired outcome states that they want the editor banished from Wikipedia for eternity, there's nothing that can be done about it. May I suggest presenting your own view in the RfC and assume that those who disagree with you are trying to act in the interests of the project, much as I have no doubt you are. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think they mean that it's aimed at his editing, which they see as a symptom of a larger problem, rather than anything against him personally. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Please review my statement regarding the (reported) personal attacks, canvassing, false accusations by User Andei nacu. Thanks and best regards. Codrin.B (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

"Biblical"
Yes and no I certainly think so, but the Manual of Style and its consensus say no. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Becritical
As Becritical is not the user I am bringing up for discussion at WP:ANI, I do not need to notify him of the discussion. However, my statement was a bit off color and I have refactored it. So please, do not take the thread off topic.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 20:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The link you provided was a discussion between you and Becritical, what else am I supposed to think?  Corvus cornix  talk  20:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Gee, I dunno. How about the thread title in both the archive and the live page?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 21:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you please stop unnecessarily focusing on my redacted statement concerning Becritical?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 21:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You redacted the comment I was referring to, which made my comment make no sense. I added another comment so that mine actually makes *some* sense now. Corvus cornix  talk  21:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I've clearly stated that I've redacted it so you need not focus on the old redacted statement.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 21:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Breweries in the US by state
I am adding all breweries from all states in the list of US Breweries. I added just these two as there was yet to be a page for Florida and I am learning about Wiki coding. States will be completed daily. Sources are being added, mostly from the Brewers Association, almost all of which links to a current wibesite. The goal is to list all the current breweries in production and build on the lacking Craftbeer section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayMaslar (talk • contribs) 06:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Brian K. Zahra
References added. Jtmichcock (talk) 01:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

ARBCOM about recent AN/I
There is an ARBCOM request which is related to an AN/I thread you recently participated. You may be interested in the discussion. -- Cycl o pia talk  10:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Why did you edit the article on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion? You claim it is false in their is no proof of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielhill1990 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Latin Kings (gang) - Possible vandalism by 98.193.22.27
User 98.193.22.27 is vandalizing the Latin Kings page again. Additionally, I believe that 98.193.22.27 is the IP address of user Zavier51, who frequently uploads copyrighted images that he claims to be his own, to the page. Could you block? 99.21.169.2 (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Explain how its antisemitic? Thats an opinion, not a fact to be posted. I has also never been proven to be false, just scholarly opinions. Apparently you are being biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielhill1990 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Answer the question, how is it antisemitic, thats an opinion, you cannot post that as a fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielhill1990 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
You stated that in my article I violated copyright by posting Tweets. There were no tweets in my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowfleurys (talk • contribs) 22:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Thanks, I have blocked him for evading blocks. But please remember to report those kinds of people to a different venue (like WP:AIV). I undid your edit (per WP:DENY) because it was especially feeding him. --Bsadowski1 06:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * There are loads of accounts. The guy was tagging his own there for a while. I don't even bother tagging them anyways, and most of them are blocked already. I did the few others that weren't. There's a /24 and possibly a /17 range that could get blocked if he gets too prolific - A l is o n  ❤ 06:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: All Nite Long
Hello Corvus cornix. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of All Nite Long, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 requires that the artist does not have an article and that there are no claims of importance/significance regarding the musical recording itself. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't tell you whether it's "All Nite Long" or "All Night Long", but the artist's name is Wikilinked in the infobox (for some reason not in the article's text). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Inclined!
Hey Corvus, I hope you're the right person to go to: I seconded a nomination and contributed to a discussion (about a year ago) to delete this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Bernson

well, they said the discussion was opened in January 30, 2011, and that already the result was "keep," however I can find no discussion, and also can not find any notable reason to keep the page, except merely as an advertisement of the artist and band. Is the nomination really to keep it? Is there another route to nominating it for deletion? I'm new at this, and want to learn and help out administratively.

Thanks!

---65.113.35.130 (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Mutya
Can't you at least give some courtesy?

It came from the broadcasting network's youtube channel. There is also an article from its news website that i put as reference for you if you haven't seen it.

Tina Mai
I'm so happy you have finally come to realize that addressing one as a "porn star" is not derogatory or an attack, but I would like for you to know that your hostile "tactics" (if you can even say that) were unnecessary and the damage has been dealt and is irreparable. I would recommend that you review an article involving adult movies as your responses to my article were rude and quite honestly tedious. YeaYourMom (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

WT:CSD
Per discussion on my talk page I've started a discussion at WT:CSD for changing the wording of G10. I think you are overestimating how much we disagree. JoshuaZ (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Chasetwomey/Zoro Tools
Hello Corvus cornix. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Chasetwomey/Zoro Tools, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Needs some time to grow in userspace first. .''' Thank you. Ged UK  10:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

jinggoy estrada
i have made corrections on the page of jinggoy estrada because i am his political staff. the birthday stated there is erronous that is why i corrected it. His birthday is February 17, 1963 not january 23.

please view - http://www.senjinggoyestrada.com/index.php/articles/view/16/13.html

also i would like to add a lot of updates regarding his accomplishments.

if you have any questions or clarifications you may email me at jinggoy@senjinggoyestrada.com

or if you still want to clear my identity... you may call our office at +6325526686 (Philippine number).

Thank you.

SHANNIE MADAYAG Chief Political Officer Office of Senator Jinggoy Ejercito Estrada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanniecm8 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Kathy Perry
Thanks for your help. I am learning something new on Wiki every day and I appreciate your advice. --BwB (talk) 19:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deltion
You said my page violated "policies" but only linked me to a page that has around 50 policies on it. What policy is it violating? Fouredits (talk) 00:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * And another one bites the dust. I was enjoying that for a while, still I suppose we mustn't feed the trolls.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

BLP Prod
You seem to have placed a BLP prod on an article asserting someone was a state legislator, when it would have been very easy to find sources. I did that, just from Google News, as expected. In fact, you seem to have actually removed a good newspaper reference before placing the prod. Yes, it was a POV edit & needed redacting, but the article cited was real enough.  DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I forgot to say, it was Matt Shea.   DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

VANDALISM
I PRACTICALLY BUILT THIS PAGE FROM IT'S VERY BEGINNING. A LOT OF WHAT YOU READ ON THE LATIN KINGS PAGE IS WHAT I WROTE AND REFERENCED. SO PLEASE DONT MISUNDERSTAND MY INTENTIONS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.22.77 (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

American Idol
Thanks for your helpful suggestion at Articles for deletion/Thia Megia (3rd nomination). Would a redirect be a suitable solution for Articles for deletion/Naima Adedapo as well? – or even for all of the biographies linked from American Idol (season 10)? Thanks in advance for any advice you can give me. --RexxS (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Kid Ink
I do not know why you tagged my post as disruptive editing. I simply re-published the article with more information to make it more creditable. ryanhuntmuzik 00:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC) rhunt999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhunt999 (talk • contribs)

Marconi Museum
sorry, Can you do it for me? please ? i don't know Move Page option :( --Pava (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)