User talk:CoryMach4


 * This would be a lot more believable if this weren't your fourth attempt. Huon (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Those are not me. CoryMach4 (talk) 01:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vajiralongkorn has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vajiralongkorn was changed by CoryMach4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9571 on 2015-02-01T23:53:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Wikipedia:Long-term abuseFredfiggglehorn"
A page you created, Wikipedia:Long-term abuseFredfiggglehorn, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User_talk:Donner60 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.