User talk:Cory Malik/Archive 2


 * }

This is my user talk archive for August 2008-October 2008.

Three-revert rule warning on The Suite Life of Zack & Cody
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 206.116.63.240 (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

3RR
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Dethme0w (talk) 04:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * "Reporting it" isn't the issue. The way it works here is discussing it on the talk page and attempting to gain consensus. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I did, he did not reply. I did post a message on the discussion page though. --Cory Malik (talk) 05:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * So are you done with making sure YOUR version sticks for now? --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I am. --Cory Malik (talk) 05:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Should be all clear now. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 06:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Want to negotiate?
Reply on my talk page or the discussion page. Sυρєrıor (Reply! ,Contribs ) 14:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Sυρєrıor (Reply! ,Contribs ) 21:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * It's good. How did you change your username? Sυρєrıor (Reply! ,Contribs ) 23:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * There I agree with it, and I made one tiny fix. Sυρєrıor (Reply! ,Contribs ) 00:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

User Toolbar
How do you apply a user toolbar. Sυρєrıor (Reply! ,Contribs ) 19:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Sυρєrıor (<font color="#FF7028">Reply! ,<font color="#FF2400">Contribs ) 02:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Bailey Pickett Grant.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bailey Pickett Grant.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes
You restored episode summaries for a series which has not yet aired. Do you have any idea where this information came from? Gimmetrow 23:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:London Tipton1.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:London Tipton1.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:London Tipton.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:London Tipton.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Osama

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CareyMartin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CareyMartin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I did not upload that--Cory Malik (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Carey Martin.jpeg
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Asher196 (talk) 14:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Carey Martin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carey Martin.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Bad fair use of Image:Carey Martin.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Carey Martin.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Carey Martin.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the non-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Carey Martin.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Bailey Pickett.jpg
Please stop uploading non-free images of living persons. This fails WP:NON-FREE, even with a fair-use rationale. If you continue you may find yourself blocked from editing. You have been warned several times. Asher196 (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Bad fair use of Image:Bailey Pickett.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Bailey Pickett.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Bailey Pickett.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the non-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Bailey Pickett.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Bailey Pickett.jpg
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.

Non-free replaceable fair-use images are not allowed on Wikipedia, period. Asher196 (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Bad fair use of Image:MaddieF.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MaddieF.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MaddieF.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the non-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:MaddieF.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Regarding fair use of Image:MaddieF.jpg
I'm, sorry, but I'm upholding the claim that this is bad fair use. It's not irreplaceable, as you could write to the company for a picture, or indeed just use a picture of the actress concerned. We can't risk being sued - I'm sure you understand. Please don't upload any more photos of this nature. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images
I see you are at it again. Let me try to explain something to you....again.... Non-free images of living persons that are reasonably replaceable are subject to deletion on Wikipedia even if they have a fair-use rationale. I am watching all of the Disney Channel related articles, so please, stop uploading them. Asher196 (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Bad fair use of Image:BaileyPickett.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BaileyPickett.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BaileyPickett.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the non-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:BaileyPickett.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:IvanaTipton.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IvanaTipton.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ian ¹³ /t  14:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:MaddieF.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MaddieF.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ian ¹³ /t  14:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Moseby.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Moseby.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ian ¹³ /t  14:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Cory in the House
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cory in the House, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed a deleted image--Cory Malik (talk)

Stop
This is a final warning. Stop uploading replaceable non-free fair-use images of living people. They fail WP:NON-FREE. You will find yourself blocked from editing if you continue. It is getting tedious keeping track of these images. Asher196 (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

TSLOD logo
Please use another logo for your userbox of The Suite Lifeo on Deck because The Suite Life on Deck's logo has a copyright. --DCFan101 (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Zack Martin.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Zack Martin.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Wizards of Waverly Place spells
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Wizards of Waverly Place spells, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Somno (talk) 05:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

List of Wizards of Waverly Place spells
Not that this will stay up long, but I have changed the PROD of this article to a speedy delete, as it has been deleted with clear consensus twice already in the past. Please stop adding this list, because it is unencyclopedic and an episode summary works better than a list of plot devices, which when it comes down to it, this list of spells is. Thank you.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Matthew Timmons
A tag has been placed on Matthew Timmons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Matty (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * As said in the template, do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. This violates Wikipedia policy, and will not save the article from speedy deletion. This actor is non-notable in my view, which is why I restored the tag placed by User:Stabbington. Please read through WP:ENTERTAINER for the inclusion guidelines on actors. Having a role in two episodes of a show is not a reason for inclusion. Please stop removing the tag from Matthew Timmons, or you may be blocked for disruption. Wait for an administrator to review the article. Matty (talk) 01:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:MatthewTimmons.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MatthewTimmons.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zack Martin.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zack Martin.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

List of TSL episodes
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. See also Talk:List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes AussieLegend (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Oliver Oken.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver Oken.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes
I've responded on the article's talk page, as it is relevant to the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The changes that you've just made to List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes amount to vandalism.
 * 1) Do not remove valid references.
 * 2) This edit, which you claimed "removed unreferenced speculation", is ridiculous. The information was only uncited because you deleted the reference. You also deleted valid changes made by another editor who, in addition to disagreeing with your inclusion of the phantom episode 88 data, changed "A * indicates that the episode was released on DVD" to "An asterisk (*) indicates that the episode was released on DVD". I should point out that as more than one editor has now disagreed with your inclusion of episode 88 you must now seek consensus on the talk page to include the information. Simply reverting to your version is considered vandalism. As stated by Wikipedia's verifiability policy, "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation."
 * 3) In addition to the issues raised in {2), your reversion changes "Original airdate" back to "U.S Air Date". As I stated on the article's talk page and in the edit summary, the episode list template uses "Original airdate", not "U.S Air Date" because Wikipedia articles are supposed to represent a world view and not concentrate on the view of any single country unless the article has specific ties to one country. TSL is seen all over the world so the article should present a world view. In order to achieve this, airdates are the date when the article first aired anywhere in the world. My edits made this quite appropriate change. You should also note that your reversion chnaged "Production code" back to "Production Code". The Manual of Style states that headings don't use title case. In this case that means that the first letter of "code" should not be capitalised.
 * 4) Another of your changes in your reversion changed The Prince and the Pauper back to The Prince and The Pauper and Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd back to  Dumb and Dumberer. The change I made corrected the wikilinks. Your reversion recreated an error and a link to a redirection page.

Wikipedia has a number of policies in place and you must follow these. You should also follow rules and guidelines. Your recent reversions have not done this. I've detailed your errors above to demonstrate how this has happened, even though I would have been quite justified in slapping a vandalism warning on your page, out of consideration. Please don't revert again. Discuss this on the talk page if you have issues with following the policy. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Three revert rule
Another policy you may care to visit is the three revert rule. You've made a number of reversions in the past couple of days and while you haven't technically breached WP:3RR yet, you're very close to the line. You've certainly breached the spirit of the rule. Be careful. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: TSL ep.
1-2. The ref was not linked to any ep so i moved it to External Links.I did not care for their edit because they had not been imformed of the wiki policy. I changed the asterick back to the correct way after that edit (a asterick (*),correct, a *,incorrect).My edit was cited,yours wasn't on the ep while mine was.You aldo made dramatic change without discussion. 3. If you looked at my next edit 30 secs later i change it to original airdate. 4.I Changed Pauper and Dumber back to your version if you check again.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * 1-2: The refernce was not linked to individual episodes because it was an article-wide reference. In such cases it's more appropriate to list it as I did rather than tack the reference on to each episode. See Citing sources for more information. I really don't understand what you mean by "I did not care for their edit because they had not been imformed of the wiki policy". Who are "they"? The reference was placed in accordance with Wikpedia policy so this makes no sense. Your edit was only cited insofar as the existence of an 88th episode was concerned. The remainder of the listing was not cited at all. Dramatic changes don't need discussion. I'm not sure where you've gotten this from. I provided an appropriate edit summary and explained the changes on the talk page. Since they corrected errors there is no need for discussion at all.
 * 3: You changed one instance. You didn't change the other two.
 * 4: Check your edits. You made no attempt to change the wikilinks until after I had explained why your edits were inappropriate.


 * The article as it stands now is incorrect. The airdates listed are not the original airdates as they are supposed to be. They are the dates first aired in the US. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * "They" are the IP address that removed it.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I have absolutely NO problem of you changing airdates. The problem was you moved the ep. It should look like it is exzept the airdates.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 21:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (talk) 11:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

It was only a few days ago, in this edit, that I warned you about removing references. You simply can not remove information that is properly cited, just because you don't agree with it. If you wish to remove it you must justify its removal. "I doubt if this Millonaire ep. actually exists" is not a valid justification. You need to provide verifiable evidence (ie cited) to support your actions. It was this sort of action that got you blocked in August and promises this time that you will stop reverting edits are unlikely to help since it's already been shown that such promises are disingenuous. Please stop your edit-warring and start abiding by wikipedia policies. Please note also that you don't own articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See: []


 * Note: The above is a false warning and was deleted from my talk page as vandalism. It is retained here for record

2nd Welcome
Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! A <sub style="color:cornflowerblue;">talk  18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Zack_Martin.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zack_Martin.PNG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. -Nard 02:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Youtube
Youtube is not considered a reliable source. This means that anything on it is not considered to be reliable, regardless of the apparent source of videos on Youtube. It's best summed up by this post at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources, specifically the following quote: That said, there is a problem with using YouTube as a venue for video sources (which are stated well elsewhere, so I will not list them again). While the original Ken Burns/PBS documentary on "Cowboys" may be reliable, a copy of that documentary (or part of it) posted to YouTube is not. This has been discussed ad-infinitum at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You can certainly use the Youtube video as a link to support another citation but you need a better source than the Youtube one. As for linking from IMDB, you've argued at length against the reliability of IMDB as a source because anybody can edit it. You can't have it both ways. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:DebbyRyan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DebbyRyan.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 13:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:DebbyRyan.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:DebbyRyan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Final Warning
Cory, I have warned you at least three times in the past about uploading pictures under 'fair use', when they do not qualify as fair use. An example is Image:London Tipton.png, which is easily replaceable by a picture of the actress concerned. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask me. If you continue to upload copyrighted pictures of characters which can be replaced by a free photo of the actor, you may be blocked for disruption. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If it is not fair use, why does wikipedia have a tv screenshot tag if they are not fair use.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 00:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That's for irreplaceable TV screen shots - not for shots of characters. For example, this gameboard or this intro sequence. Image:PorkersPickett.png is hardly irreplaceable. Wikipedia policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. Ask yourself: Would the article make sense without this picture being included? if the answer is yes, it doesn't meet fair use. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:London Tipton.png
Thanks for uploading Image:London Tipton.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:BPickett.png
Thanks for uploading Image:BPickett.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Woody TSL.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Woody TSL.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Moseby.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Moseby.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:CareyMartin.png
Thanks for uploading Image:CareyMartin.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:HarperWOWP.png
Thanks for uploading Image:HarperWOWP.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:MaxRusso.png
Thanks for uploading Image:MaxRusso.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Hughleys.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hughleys.gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:MCFOTW.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MCFOTW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:RockofLove.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RockofLove.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:IvanaTipton.png
Thanks for uploading Image:IvanaTipton.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:CoryinTheHousePoster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CoryinTheHousePoster.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Oliver Oken.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver Oken.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:JacksonStewartHM.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JacksonStewartHM.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:PorkersPickett.png
Thanks for uploading Image:PorkersPickett.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Final Warning
Please see my talk page-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 00:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no fair-use pictures of the actors available.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Then get some free pictures of the actors. Visit their home towns, and take a photo of them whilst they're out and about, or write to them and ask them to send you an uncopyrighted photograph. There's no reason legally why we need photos of the characters or actors anyway, the articles are perfectly readable and understandable without them. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Title cards are borderline... However, it depicts something which "could be adequately covered with text alone". I'm not tagging all your images, you see, because I'm following the rules. Image:Hughleys.gif is not quite a title card. It's a picture of all the characters in the show. Indeed, it's described as "Image depicting The Hughleys.", not as "TV Show Title Card" or anything of the sort. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 02:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Debby Ryan (again)
I note that you have now provided source data for this image but the licensing is inappropriate. The image that you've attributed as the source is quite clearly marked "© All rights reserved" and if you look at Upload/Flickr you'll see that such images are not usable at Wikipedia. It's certainly not licensed under CC2. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:BPickettDude.png
Thanks for uploading Image:BPickettDude.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 02:23, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:DebbyRyan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DebbyRyan.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. AussieLegend (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:MCFOTW.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MCFOTW.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Lovebug (Jonas Brothers song)
Hey, I'm just letting you know that I undid the move. There's no need to predisambiguate, per Wikipedia's Manual of Style, as there are no other Lovebug song articles. Once they come up, then there would be a need to disambiguate into "so-and-so's song", but for now, it should stay at Lovebug (song). I hope that makes sense. SKS2K6 (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BPickettDude.png)
 Thanks for uploading Image:BPickettDude.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NrDg 21:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Images in Bailey Pickett article
Please contribute to the discussion in the article talk page. Reverting as a form of discussion is seldom persuasive. Note that a requirement for fair-use is minimal usage. I can support one image in the article, not two, as fair use. --NrDg 22:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * if one had to deleted delete the one of her as a guy.-- Jay M. Baxter-Payne <font face="Bookman Old Style" color="red" size="2"> (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Please remove the unwanted image from the article (undo your last revert) and I will delete the unused image as a creator request. I am pleased to see that you are updating the fair-use rationales on most the character screenshots. If no other admin acts on the deletion tags in a few days, I plan on marking them as a justified keep. --NrDg 22:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

The length of a month
I just thought I'd point out the innacuracy of this edit summary. The last discussion on this still unresolved matter was on 9 October, 22 days ago. All months, even February, are longer than 22 days. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)