User talk:CosmicResonator

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Just zis Guy you know? 20:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The article you wrote on White Roxx was deleted as failing to establish notability. I think you've seen WP:MUSIC, what would be needed as a minimum would be a summary discography, details of label and such, and all facts verifiable from reliable sources. It needs to be written in neutral terms (which pretty much excludes language like "interestingly,...") and should make it plain how we might be expected to know the subject from a hole in the ground ;-) Feel free to ask if you would like any guidance, although be aware that I have little actual interest in current bands so can't be expected to show actual enthusiasm as such - I can and will, however, help with what qualifies as a reliable source, tone, etc. Alternatively you might find more specialist help at WikiProject Music. Just zis Guy you know? 20:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The Jim Armstrong article is a copy&paste from the official website, did you asked for permission to use this on WP? Miskellaneous 12:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello CosmicResonator! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Clive Culbertson -

Non-free rationale for File:Shoreline - Pollack &#38; Shampoo (by Jim Manley).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shoreline - Pollack &. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)