User talk:Cosmogoblin

May 2010
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Amy's Choice (Doctor Who). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. magnius (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:Original research
With regard to your question here, it might be an idea to ask at the talk page of the relevant article where others familiar wih the subject will be able to advise on how best to include the information. Generally finding a source for any new material is preferred, although I think with the synopsis of a film or television episode the film/episode itself is regarded as being sufficient. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Sol 0 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sol 0 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sol 0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anarchyte  (work  &#124; talk )   08:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)