User talk:Cosmorox

December 2011
In a recent edit to the page Pug, you changed one or more words from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Computer spell checks are adjusted according to your locale: your spellcheck is using American spelling, so it wants you to write humor, color, plow, or tire, but a British editor would write humour, colour, plough or tyre. Since Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia, our policy is to leave national variations in spelling alone, as long as they're consistent within a given article, so I reverted your well-intentioned correction. Please remember also that all material on Wikipedia must be supported by references, and that personal opinions are not admissible. Happy editing!   Acroterion   (talk)   22:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmo the Pug


A tag has been placed on Cosmo the Pug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a specific animal, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Although, in fact, I am a very nice person, I've had to delete the article on Cosmo, since we can't keep articles about people or pets who aren't notable. Please remember that encyclopedias only cover things that can be verified in other publications about things and people that have been noticed by the world in general.  I appreciate your interest in Wikipedia, but it may be that you haven't quite matured enough to be able to contribute the way Wikipedia wants you too.  Sorry to be discouraging,   Acroterion   (talk)   22:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Has this dog been written about in newspapers?  Acroterion   (talk)   23:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmo the pug


A tag has been placed on Cosmo the pug requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. red dog six (talk) 00:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Why Was My Article Deleted?
That's the question you are probably asking yourself right now. Well, there are a couple reasons your article could have been deleted.


 * 1) It may not have met the General notability guideline.  This is the guideline that all articles must meet before they can be included on Wikipedia.
 * 2) It may not have been notable.  If a subject isn't notable, it isn't included.  Your little brother's garage rock band with 5 fans isn't notable, but Metallica...that's notable.
 * 3) It may not have been verifiable.  If an article doesn't have several third-party reliable sources, it can be deleted as original research.
 * 4) It may have been advertising.  Any page about a company of any sort must meet strict guidelines so it isn't considered advertisting.  A page about the local quickie-mart is probably advertising and also probably not notable.


 * We welcome articles written as part of school assigments. Note that if your article is part of a school project, it must still meet our requirements. It might be useful for your project to be registered at the School and university projects WikiProject, and you can look there for some help specifically with your school-related project.

To create an article, first, please read WP:FIRST. This page is about creating your first article. Then get all the information you can on the subject. Create the article first in userspace (on a subpage of your userpage) so it won't get deleted before you are finished. Add all the information, references, reliable sources and more to the page. Make sure it meets the General notability guideline. If you aren't sure, ask an admin, they will be glad to help. Then move it to where you want it in mainspace (on the Wikipedia). From there, keep it updated with pertinent updated information, so the article doesn't become stale. When in doubt with anything, ask the Help desk or an admin. Hope this helps... Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 01:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)