User talk:Cossomoios

.

Speedy deletion nomination of Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund
Hello Cossomoios,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mduvekot (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Südwesterößenmaßstäbergehund until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Exemplo347. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that removing the Article for Deletion template from an article does not stop the deletion process. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southwesterly Hound


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Southwesterly Hound, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ramaksoud2000&oldid=752958977. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)