User talk:Costliestpants

Welcome!

Hello, Costliestpants, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Cherokee (song) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Biker Biker (talk) 06:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Your drive-by change of genre on a large number of articles is unwelcome. Please don't do this without adding reliable sources to support each change. '' Biker Biker (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Love Chaser, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Your unsourced fiddling with genres is now simple vandalism. Please stop. '' Biker Biker (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 19:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I strongly suggest you follow the advice in the warnings above - if you continue after the expiration of this block, you may be blocked indefinitely. – Connormah (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hysteria (Def Leppard album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AOR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Connormah (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems that you do not acknowledge your first block's reasons and heeded my warning following your block template so as promised, you are now blocked indefinitely to prevent further disruption. You are welcome to request unblock as always but please note that if you continue to fail to acknowledge that your editing has been considered disruptive by others, it probably won't work too well in your favor. – Connormah (talk) 00:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)