User talk:Cosworth404

Please do not continue the disruptive editing. Please follow Wikipedia guidelines. All information should be factual with properly cited sources. It is easier if you work within the framework provided on the page.

Thank you.

Somermoth.

Hi:

With all due respect, please discontinue your disruptive editing. There is a Catholic Pacific Page, why not use that? You replaced everything on the Redeemer Pacific Page a while back, leaving it the creation of one single editor (yourself), a page that "reads like an advertisement" which is contrary to wikipedia guidelines. I won't report you if you let the RPC page go back to its original multi authored state. Cosworth404 (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Cosworth404

You are factually incorrect on a few points. 1. RPC did not cease to exist in 2011. 2. It changed its name in 2015, but is the same college. 3. It was not taken over by an ecclesial movement at any time. Most of what you have written have no cited sources. I wrote original copy for each source cited. Why do you want to damage the college with this kind of conjecture? If you want to make a contribution, put it in the history section.

Someramoth

Hi again:

You've changed it again I see.

Your first two points are debatable.

Re point 3: The entry did not say that RPC was taken over by an ecclesial movement.

No cited sources because you are not giving me time to reinsert them.

I'm not looking to damage Catholic Pacific, which should have it's own page, but to keep the history accurate. This is the RPC page. You should develop the CPC page. I know you've been turned down by a Wiki editor, but if you left the RPC page as it was before you changed it, and did not write the page like an ad, you wouldn't have been turned down.

We are currently both putting up "one editor only" pages, and it appears that both of us have a very strong interest in our particular version. Your version does read like an Ad for CPC. That's not according to the guidelines, but I won't make an issue of that.

I will leave your version up, since this is getting childish, and we'll let Wikipedia decide.

I won't report you, because that's vindictive, and we shouldn't be doing that Phillip.

By the way, I think you folks have done the right thing by having a campus at St. Nick's. It is a better facility than CPC has currently, and the new program is available to more students because the cost is lower.

I wish you all the best. Once the CPC Wiki page starts coming up when people google "Catholic Pacific College" I would ask you to be kind enough to let others post on the RPC page.

God bless:

"Costworth404"``` Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Catholic Pacific College a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. —me_and 19:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)