User talk:Cotevertu

Speedy deletion nomination of Fretful


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widr (talk) 18:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Sturisoma aureum, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk &#124; contrib) 18:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Formula One with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. K6ka (talk &#124; contrib) 18:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Daniel Knost has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Daniel Knost was changed by Cotevertu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936742 on 2014-01-20T16:52:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Bettman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Bettman was changed by Cotevertu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950328 on 2014-01-20T17:09:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 20:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I haven't unblocked you, but have reduced your block to 72 hours. If you resume disruptive editing after the block expires, there will not be another second chance. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 18:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Please note recent user rename requests from this user . – xeno talk  18:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)