User talk:Coulomb1

Hello, feel free to post anything here. If you're here to be mean, try to restrain yourself as much as possible.

Welcome!
Hi Coulomb1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Thinker78 (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 * Hello, Coulomb1,
 * If you have questions about something so specific and well-defined as article assessment for WikiProjects, it's better to bring it to the Teahouse than post a question on a Talk page that few people might ever come across. There are amost always some editors who are hanging out at the Teahouse and you are likely to get your answer faster there.
 * Also, please be careful with page moves and don't just move them because you think a different page title is better. There are guidelines about proper page titles and, for example, the category titles for article assessment are kept consistent over thousands of categories so inventing something new is not likely to be lasting. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Liz, thanks. This is helpful.
 * Sorry if my move was wrong. I saw that the title was uncapitalized so I thought it was a move not needing much discussion. Coulomb1 (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Vanderwaalforces. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to ISBN have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. PS: The outcome of this your edit might be very much unintended, just letting you know. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Vanderwaalforces. I don't see exactly what the edit does wrong; could you please explain further? Coulomb1 (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please, take a look at your diff. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Yep I still don't know what exactly I did wrong. I changed 'will' to 'much,' which I believe is better wording, and changed the source a bit.
 * I need a specific explanation of what I did wrong because I really have no idea lol. Coulomb1 (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You removed the short description template and added Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The short template removal was accidental but the rest was on purpose. Is there anything wrong with what I did besides the short description template? Coulomb1 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compute pipeline (February 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compute pipeline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Compute_pipeline Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Encoded&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Compute_pipeline reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded Talk to me! 17:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Encoded. I added some more in-depth citations and resubmitted. Now the article has sources from Microsoft's documentation and certain in-depth sources from NVIDIA and AMD employees. Coulomb1 (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compute pipeline (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compute pipeline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Compute_pipeline Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CoconutOctopus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Compute_pipeline reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus  talk  22:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compute pipeline (April 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compute pipeline and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Compute_pipeline Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Compute_pipeline reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Norms at AfD
Hello Coulomb, thanks for contributing to the AfD discussion on EGM Green. I just wanted to let you know for future reference: generally if someone nominates an article for deletion on the grounds it fails notability guidelines, it's safe to assume they themselves have already attempted the standard checks for potentially useful sources and found nothing, unless you have good reason to think this isn't the case. Of course, you should perform your own independent checks to make sure the nominator hasn't missed anything, but the fact that the nominator has performed their own standard checks is usually left implicit. Cheers – Teratix ₵ 15:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks!! I'll keep that in mind. Coulomb1 (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hello, you added an unreliable tag after an MSNBC article. You can check consensus about source reliability for famous organizations at WP:RSP. MSNBC is considered by the community to be generally reliable. Just wanted to make sure you saw this. Closhund /talk/  05:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry for this. I misremembered the consensus of reliability of MSNBC. Thanks for telling me. Coulomb1 (talk) 05:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)