User talk:Counterpart0

Re:Rules/Regulations
Yeah, you can, as long as it's verifiable. But don't overwrite the article. Just add the missing information. Thanks for participating in AFC Backlog Reduction Drive and have a nice day. - Flubeca Talk 14:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

AFC Barnstar
Congratulations on being one of the first two recipients of the the AFC Barnstar. You may use the Barnstar or the ribbon. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  23:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I added instructions to finding the backlog
See here.

A tag has been placed on Stacy's Music Row Report, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 18:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy me. :)  I saw it in Recent changes.  Corvus cornix 18:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Heh. It helps vandal fighters and those of us who try to winnow the chaff out. Corvus cornix 18:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The "first responder" found "blatant advertising." This person doesn't know Stacy Harris. Please check his bio page attached to Stacy's Music Row Report. Then check the pages that show who Stacy's readers are- media, industry and fans. These entities don't spend time on "advertising."

170.190.40.78 20:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Your instructions are too complicated, but we agree: Stacy's Music Row Report is a legitimate site. There's no blatant advertising for it, though it is an advertiser-supported site. 75.73.178.16 03:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

That's right. I tried to follow the instructions and I don't get it either. Maybe they're trying to call Stacy a spammer.

Are they trying to say she spams her own site? This makes no sense and they certainly haven't provided any examples or documentation. 72.154.245.159 04:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

We contest the tagging? How can you ask for donations and then deny us information about Stacy's Music Row Report? 65.1.219.30 02:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure who you are talking to, but could you please take your discussion to their page. I have nothing to do with the article you are discussing. I was simply helping with the backlog and felt (at the time) that it deserved a place in wikipedia, the guidelines disagreed. Please do not reply to this on my talk page anymore. --Counterpart0 00:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you can get Stacy's Music Row Report to the proper Wikipedia entry page? You blame his fans for not being able to figure it out, but you don't help none.

http://countrymusicreport.com/ONTHERECORDII.htm 170.190.40.78 (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

He writes some good CD reviews. Very fair critic. I think Wikipedia will have an entry for Stacy or Stacy's Music Row Report soon. 170.190.40.78 (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Devajyoti Ray
This article which you posted on behalf of User:210.214.80.117 has been deleted as a recreation of an article deleted per AfD. Tyrenius 23:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you can get Stacy's Music Row Report to the proper Wikipedia entry page? You blame his fans for not being able to figure it out, but you don't help none.

http://countrymusicreport.com/ONTHERECORDII.htm 170.190.40.78 (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

in Wikipedia who all are deciding what to include and what not is not known. This article has been deleted. why not known? is the information provided insufficient? why don't your editors do some research on their own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.240.10 (talk) 04:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Adam Sims
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Adam Sims, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Adam Sims seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Adam Sims, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

AFC Drive - Last Day!
As I write this message, we officially have 2 hours left before the end of the drive. Prizes will be awarded tomorrow, so don't worry, I haven't forgotten. It's been a great drive, with tons of work accomplished. Thanks, everyone. GrooveDog GrooveBot 21:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Automaticlly delivered by GrooveBot at 21:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:AFC Backlog Drive
''You are receiving this letter because you are listed as a participant in the Articles for creation WikiProject at WP:WPAFC. To avoid receiving further notices, please remove your name from the list. Thanks!''

AfC news
Dear AfC participant, If you no longer wish to receive messages from WikiProject Articles for creation, please remove your name from this list. Thank you.
 * 1) Msgj and Tnxman307 are organising the AfC challenge! It's a little competition to help improve some of the articles created through AfC and we are hoping that everyone will get involved. For level 1, you just need to bring a stub up to Start-class. Level 2 is improving a Start-class article to C-class. And so on. To get involved or for more information please see the competition page.
 * 2) Those of you who haven't reviewed an article recently might not have noticed the new process that was implemented this year. Reviewing articles is now more enjoyable than ever :) You might like to give it a try. All articles waiting for review are in Category:Pending Afc requests. (Please read the updated instructions.)
 * 3) Please consider adding AFC status to your userpage to keep track of the number of articles waiting for review. At the time of writing we are officially backlogged, so help is needed!
 * 4) There is currently a proposal to bring the Images for upload process under the umbrella of WikiProject Articles for creation. The rationale is that both processes are designed to allow unregistered users to take part more fully in Wikipedia, and partipants in each process can probably help each other.

Notability of David Baxby
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on David Baxby, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because David Baxby seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting David Baxby, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Counterpart0/Naruto mainpage
User:Counterpart0/Naruto mainpage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Counterpart0/Naruto mainpage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Counterpart0/Naruto mainpage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 13:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 00:45, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 12:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. -- Mdann 52   talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!