User talk:CountingKoalas/sandbox

Peer review by Amy Fountain
I think this version is a significant improvement on the current article - it's cleaned up several areas that were not relevant to Robinson's work, and it's clearly written.

The lead is clear and makes sense. The article is written in a way that is accessible to non-specialists. I'm not a mathematician, but I felt like I could follow the overviews about Robinson's contributions in Mathematics. To the extent I could tell, it looks like the references are appropriate. The page does not read as biased. I didn't find broken links. You've noted that there are some duplicate references to clean up...I started writing this feedback before looking more closely at references, so will come back with a second entry to this page in a moment. AmyFou (talk) 21:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Back again - I see the references you are referring to, and checked the remainder to make sure that external links were in order, and everything took me to where I expected to go.

AmyFou (talk) 22:01, 21 August 2018 (UTC)