User talk:CourageousRhino

November 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to ManKind Project, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 21:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at ManKind Project. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your desire to spread your experience and insight... but Wikipedia is not designed for personal views or for people to chronicle their experiences. We specialize in verifiable information. I hope that you find an appropriate outlet to spread your truth. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ManKind Project. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RH cosm  (talk)  02:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

My original edit was deleted, why
It appears my added information was deleted several times first before I resorted to tit for tat. I simply want to add this info from my experience. Please advise....

The MKP organization is more of an aspiration than a reality. In my experience it is often dangerously abusive to members who question ethics or who question those who are dubbed as "leaders". There is no accountability in the organization and abuses of power over men in who are encouraged to become emotionally vulnerable are frequent. In one such case, a USA leader who is active in the Mexico organization, and the Mexico board would not tolerate monetary ethical questions. Rather than transparency and welcoming discussion, the member who questioned was surgically removed from participation in their group and subjected in emails to racial, national and verbal sexual denigration by the USA / MX leader in question. This behavior is tolerated and anyone who dares to address it, will be castigated and impugned. This is my experience. CourageousRhino (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * This website is for objective information on a subject. It is not for personal experience or criticisms.  It would be acceptable if you found and shared criticism of this project written by a reliable source.  Otherwise you should post your critique on a site dedicated to reviews. LynxTufts (talk) 14:08, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

CourageousRhino, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to ManKind Project, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)