User talk:Court.pow2/Memphis College of Art/Katien13 Peer Review

Lead: There is not much here to evaluate. The article has one paragraph total, but it seems like it could be the lead section of a potential page. It gives a slight overview of what the article should be about.

Content: The content included here is relevant and up to date. It is extremely limited, however. It is missing major sections that the topic should include.

Tone and Balance: The tone is neutral and does not seem like it is at all trying to persuade readers.

Sources and References: This is a good point in the article, that it has many sources that are reliable. They are cited well, after the sentences that need it.

Organization: It is organized so far. There are no headings or subheadings.

Overall: The article is very incomplete but has some facts that are backed up.

Katien13 (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

My Wikipedia Article
Hello, I think you peer reviewed the wrong article. The draft I've been working on is through this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Court.pow2/New_sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Court.pow2 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)