User talk:Covhero

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sarah Dines has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sarah Dines was changed by Covhero (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853156 on 2020-12-14T19:34:07+00:00

January 2021
Hello, Covhero. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sarah Dines, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 02:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sarah Dines, you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow ( ✉ ) 18:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Sarah Dines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Ben Key
Thanks for contributing to the article Ben Key. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)